DSpace Collection:
https://hdl.handle.net/10171/16986
2024-03-28T20:22:19ZDe la geometría legal estatal al redescubrimiento del derecho y de la política. Estudios en honor de Francesco Gentil. [Reseña]
https://hdl.handle.net/10171/17468
Title: De la geometría legal estatal al redescubrimiento del derecho y de la política. Estudios en honor de Francesco Gentil. [Reseña]
Abstract: Reseña de: Miguel AYUSO TORRES (ed.). De la geometría legal estatal al redescubrimiento
del derecho y de la política. Estudios en honor de Francesco Gentile,
Fundación Francisco Elias de Tejada, Marcial Pons, Madrid-Barcelona, 2006,
422 pp.2008-01-01T00:00:00ZLa paradoja de la prohibición de prohibir y el sueño libertario de 1968.
https://hdl.handle.net/10171/17467
Title: La paradoja de la prohibición de prohibir y el sueño libertario de 1968.
Abstract: A reasoning in accordance with legal logic evinces the damaging
consequences following from a principle forbidding all prohibitions. Such a
farfetched aspiration fits in with a craving for the utmost freedom. Nomologic
analysis shows such a craving to be unattainable and self destructive. I propose
instead an alternative meta-legal criterion, faithful to a liberal inspiration,
which -within the framework of a pluralistic and gradual is tic axiology- acknowledges
the value of freedom as one which is not subservient to any other.
This value is implemented in particular bundles of liberties depending on the
historic and social circumstances; unavoidably such an implementation gives
rise to collisions, not only among sundry concrete liberties but also between
freedom and other high-rank values.2008-01-01T00:00:00ZLa barba di Solzenicyn e la frammentazione dei diritti umani.
https://hdl.handle.net/10171/17346
Title: La barba di Solzenicyn e la frammentazione dei diritti umani.
Abstract: This article is in some respects provoking. It starts using a quotation
from the famous Kundera s book on Immortality as a peg to hang a discussion
on the transformation of individual whishes into rights and on the fragmentation
sustained by human rights after the cultural revolution of 1968.
It was in that period that the evolution of modern legal and political thought
(deeply rooted in gnosticism) reached its climax, after developing through Scolastic
rationalism in the 14th century and the modern doctrines of natural law
(together with the scientific revolution) in the 16th.
Between the 18th and the 19th century the human rights went through an age of
abstractness (the Enlightment and the Déclaration in 1789) and then of socialization,
until their ultimate denial as "individual" rights in the 20th century, dominated
by totalitarian nationalism and communism (both anti-individualistic).
After the Nuremberg Trial and the rising crisis of legal positivism, the human
rights have been submitted to a process of constitutionalization and internationalization
(see UN Universal Declaration) which, however, have not been able
to cast light on their pre-normative (i.e. metaphysical) nature. In such a way
human rights remain under control of a single power (either from a nation state
or from some supranational community) instead of being founded on what is
essentially human.
It is the individualistic nature of modern human rights, strenghtened by secularization
in the post-modern age, that prevents the durable foundation of human
rights from being revealed, leaving them to the fragmentation of individual
wishes - as written in Kundera 's book.
Only a deep rethink of the (gnostic) process which has led mankind to modernity
could allow us to save the notion of "human right", bringing it from the pluralistic
fragmentation to the essence of the law.2008-01-01T00:00:00ZDe 1968 a 2008: consecuencias en bioderecho de la revolución sexual.
https://hdl.handle.net/10171/17345
Title: De 1968 a 2008: consecuencias en bioderecho de la revolución sexual.
Abstract: La libertad sexual es uno de los iconos del 68. Los acontecimientos
de ese año en relación con la liberación de la mujer condujeron a la lucha por
el derecho a la anticoncepción y al aborto. El objeto de este trabajo es el derecho
al aborto como un derecho nacido al amparo de la libertad sexual y su
reivindicación como un derecho a reconocer en las legislaciones positivas. En
el articulo se esgrimen varios argumentos que sostienen que tal reivindicación
supone un cambio en relación con la mentalidad del 48.2008-01-01T00:00:00Z