Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorOrtiz-de-Landázuri, C. (Carlos)es_ES
dc.date.accessioned2003-10-09T16:31:43Zes_ES
dc.date.available2003-10-09T16:31:43Zes_ES
dc.date.issued2003es_ES
dc.identifier.citationAnuario Filosófico, 2003 (36), 409 - 439-
dc.identifier.issn0066-5215es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10171/103es_ES
dc.description.abstractToday Habermas and Apel represent two opposite position in the debate of the fate of democracy in the European Union: the deliberative democracy, based in a utopia of dominion free community and the theory institutional of complementary participation in public decision, based in a discursive ethics of common responsibility, that also is defended in the conclusion.es_ES
dc.format.extent263930 byteses_ES
dc.format.extent111104 byteses_ES
dc.format.extent67710 byteses_ES
dc.format.extent263930 bytes-
dc.format.extent111104 bytes-
dc.format.extent67710 bytes-
dc.format.extent1880 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/mswordes_ES
dc.format.mimetypetext/htmles_ES
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/msword-
dc.format.mimetypetext/html-
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain-
dc.language.isospaes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.subjectApel, Karl-Ottoes_ES
dc.subjectHabermas, Jürgenes_ES
dc.subjectUnión Europeaes_ES
dc.subjectDemocraciaes_ES
dc.titleEl destino de la democracia: ¿Universalismo deliberativo o complementariedad participativa?es_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.15581/009.36.29422es_ES

Files in This Item:
Thumbnail
File
6. EL DESTINO DE LA DEMOCRACIA...,CARLOS ORTIZ DE LANDÁZURI.pdf
Description
Size
3.65 MB
Format
Adobe PDF


Statistics and impact
0 citas en
0 citas en

Items in Dadun are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.