Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.creator | Rovira, R. (Rogelio) | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2011-02-05T10:50:21Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2011-02-05T10:50:21Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2006 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Anuario Filosófico, 39/3 (2006), 747-767 | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0066-5215 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10171/16176 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | The aim of this paper is to show that Kant’s objections against the Aristotelian catalogue of categories are unfounded. Kant’s criticisms are unfamiliar with basic distinctions of Aristotle’s philosophy, or rest on mere equivoques, or are built on principles radically opposed to those of the Aristotelian realism. | es_ES |
| dc.language.iso | spa | es_ES |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es_ES |
| dc.subject | categorías | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Kant, Immanuel | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Aristóteles | es_ES |
| dc.title | ¿Una lista desordenada y defectuosa? Consideraciones sobre la crítica de Kant al elenco aristotélico de las categorías | es_ES |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.15581/009.39.29283 | es_ES |
Files in This Item:
Statistics and impact
Items in Dadun are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
