Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorGherri, P. (Paolo)
dc.date.accessioned2011-06-01T08:36:48Z-
dc.date.available2011-06-01T08:36:48Z-
dc.date.issued2006-
dc.identifier.citationIUS CANONICUM, XLVI, N. 92, 2006, págs. 521-556es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0021-325X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10171/18312-
dc.description.abstractIn the recent years, we have witnessed in the field of canonical science an unexpected attribution of methodological reference to the theologian Hans Urs von Balthasar, on the part of authors who have believed that elements not only hermeneutical but also methodological can be extracted from his philosophical-theological reflection. In the present study, two «recent» works are analysed which permit to capture efficiently what does it entail a gullible methodological reference to Disciplines whose connections with the canonical science have not been formalized sufficiently. It concerns above all the reference of the canonists to systematic theology (intellectus fidei -what the diverse theologians think-)...es_ES
dc.language.isoitaes_ES
dc.publisherInstituto Martín Azpilicuetaes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.subjectMaterias Investigacion::Derecho canónicoes_ES
dc.subjectEducación cristianaes_ES
dc.subjectEnseñanzaes_ES
dc.subjectHans Urs von Balthasares_ES
dc.subjectTeología doctrinales_ES
dc.subjectHermenéuticaes_ES
dc.titleCanonistica e teologia: problemi circa il riferimento metodologico a von Balthasares_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.15581/016.46.14617es_ES

Files in This Item:
Thumbnail
File
23435572.pdf
Description
Size
136.17 kB
Format
Adobe PDF


Statistics and impact
0 citas en
0 citas en

Items in Dadun are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.