Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.creator | Salerno, G. (Gustavo) | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-05-30T08:09:40Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-05-30T08:09:40Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Salerno, G. (2007). ""Rigorismo y pluralidad de principios en ética"". Anuario Filosófico, 40 (3), 697-717 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.issn | 0066-5215 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10171/22304 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The problem of the applicability of moral principles is one of the most significant issues of practical reflection. With Kant's practical philosophy, the ethical demands of universality and individuality came to seem incompatible. After reviewing the outlooks of Apel and Simmel, who both offer paradigmatic answers to the “rigorism” of the categorical imperative, this article presents the issue from the perspective of Maliandi's “Convergent Ethics”. It suggests that Maliandi's recognition of an “a priori of conflictivity” and of the bi-dimensional character of reason surmounts the shortages of both Apel's and Simmel's philosophies. | es_ES |
dc.language.iso | spa | es_ES |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es_ES |
dc.subject | Rigorismo | es_ES |
dc.subject | Principio | es_ES |
dc.subject | Ética | es_ES |
dc.subject | Conflicto | es_ES |
dc.subject | Aplicabilidad | es_ES |
dc.title | Rigorismo y pluralidad de principios en ética | es_ES |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
dc.type.driver | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.15581/009.40.29252 | es_ES |
Files in This Item:
Statistics and impact
Items in Dadun are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.