Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.creator | Echarte-Alonso, L.E. (Luis Enrique) | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-06-01T10:33:12Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-06-01T10:33:12Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Echarte, L.E. | es_ES |
dc.identifier.issn | 0066-5215 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10171/22394 | - |
dc.description.abstract | In this paper I study the problem of unconscious ends, firstly, comparing three alternative physicalist views expressed in the systems of Nicolai Hartmann, Daniel Dennett and Pierre Teilhard de Chardin. Via this comparison, I show how the phenomenological perspective of the first author brings out the deficits of Dennett’s eliminativism and Teilhard’s panpsychism. Secondly, however, I criticize Hartmann’s thesis that ends are inaccessible events to objective knowledge, using certain arguments from Elizabeth Anscombe and Anthony Kenny. | es_ES |
dc.language.iso | spa | es_ES |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es_ES |
dc.subject | Alma | es_ES |
dc.subject | Inconsciente | es_ES |
dc.subject | Teleología | es_ES |
dc.subject | Fin | es_ES |
dc.title | La mente en la naturaleza. El problema de la finalidad de lo inconsciente | es_ES |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
dc.type.driver | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.15581/009.41.29228 | es_ES |
Files in This Item:
Statistics and impact
Items in Dadun are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.