Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorFernandez, R. (Rafael)-
dc.creatorTizon, A.I. (Ana Isabel)-
dc.creatorGonzalez, J. (Javier)-
dc.creatorMonedero, P. (Pablo)-
dc.creatorGarcia-Sanchez, M. (Manuela)-
dc.creatorTorre, M.V. (María Victoria) de la-
dc.creatorIbañez, P. (Pedro)-
dc.creatorFrutos, F. (Fernando)-
dc.creatorGomez, M.J. (María Jesús)-
dc.creatorMarcos, A. (Alfredo)-
dc.creatorHernandez, G. (Gonzalo)-
dc.date.accessioned2012-12-19T15:42:53Z-
dc.date.available2012-12-19T15:42:53Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.citationFernandez R, Tizon AI, Gonzalez J, Monedero P, Garcia-Sanchez M, et al. Intensive care unit discharge to the ward with a tracheostomy cannula as a risk factor for mortality: a prospective, multicenter propensity analysis. Crit Care Med. 2011 Oct;39(10):2240-2245.es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0090-3493-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10171/27484-
dc.description.abstractTo analyze the impact of decannulation before intensive care unit discharge on ward survival in nonexperimental conditions. DESIGN: Prospective, observational survey. SETTING: Thirty-one intensive care units throughout Spain. PATIENTS: All patients admitted from March 1, 2008 to May 31, 2008. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: At intensive care unit discharge, we recorded demographic variables, severity score, and intensive care unit treatments, with special attention to tracheostomy. After intensive care unit discharge, we recorded intensive care unit readmission and hospital survival. STATISTICS: Multivariate analyses for ward mortality, with Cox proportional hazard ratio adjusted for propensity score for intensive care unit decannulation. We included 4,132 patients, 1,996 of whom needed mechanical ventilation. Of these, 260 (13%) were tracheostomized and 59 (23%) died in the intensive care unit. Of the 201 intensive care unit tracheostomized survivors, 60 were decannulated in the intensive care unit and 141 were discharged to the ward with cannulae in place. Variables associated with intensive care unit decannulation (non-neurologic disease [85% vs. 64%], vasoactive drugs [90% vs. 76%], parenteral nutrition [55% vs. 33%], acute renal failure [37% vs. 23%], and good prognosis at intensive care unit discharge [40% vs. 18%]) were included in a propensity score model for decannulation. Crude ward mortality was similar in decannulated and nondecannulated patients (22% vs. 23%); however, after adjustment for the propensity score and Sabadell Score, the presence of a tracheostomy cannula was not associated with any survival disadvantage with an odds ratio of 0.6 [0.3-1.2] (p=.1). CONCLUSION: In our multicenter setting, intensive care unit discharge before decannulation is not a risk factor.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherLippincott, Williams & Wilkinses_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.subjectIntensive Care Units/statistics and numerical dataes_ES
dc.subjectRespiration, Artificial/mortalityes_ES
dc.subjectTracheostomyes_ES
dc.titleIntensive care unit discharge to the ward with a tracheostomy cannula as a risk factor for mortality: A prospective, multicenter propensity analysises_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182227533es_ES

Files in This Item:
Thumbnail
File
Crit Care med.2011.2240.pdf
Description
Size
163.8 kB
Format
Adobe PDF


Statistics and impact

Items in Dadun are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.