Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorPons-Beltran, V. (Vicente)-
dc.creatorGonzalez-Suarez, B. (Begoña)-
dc.creatorGomez-Asanza, C. (Cecilia)-
dc.creatorPerez-Cuadrado, V. (V.)-
dc.creatorFernandez-Diez, S. (Servando)-
dc.creatorFernandez-Urien, I. (Ignacio)-
dc.creatorMata-Bilbao, A. (Alfredo)-
dc.creatorEspinos-Perez, J.C. (Jorge Carlos)-
dc.creatorPerez-Grueso, M.J. (María José)-
dc.creatorArguello-Viudez, L. (Lidia)-
dc.creatorValle-Muñoz, J. (Julio)-
dc.creatorCarballo-Alvarez, F. (Fernando)-
dc.creatorMuñoz-Navas, M. (Miguel)-
dc.creatorLlach-Vila, J. (José)-
dc.creatorRamirez-Armengol, J.A. (Juan Andrés)-
dc.creatorBalanzo-Tintore, J. (Joaquin)-
dc.creatorSala-Felix, T. (Teresa)-
dc.creatorMenchen, P. (Pedro)-
dc.date.accessioned2012-12-19T16:35:56Z-
dc.date.available2012-12-19T16:35:56Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.citationPons Beltran V, Gonzalez Suarez B, Gonzalez Asanza C, Perez-Cuadrado E, Fernandez Diez S, Fernandez-Urien I, et al. Evaluation of different bowel preparations for small bowel capsule endoscopy: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Dig Dis Sci 2011 Oct;56(10):2900-2905.es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0163-2116-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10171/27490-
dc.description.abstractTo obtain an adequate view of the whole small intestine during capsule endoscopy (CE) a clear liquid diet and overnight fasting is recommended. However, intestinal content can hamper vision in spite of these measures. Our aim was to evaluate tolerance and degree of intestinal cleanliness during CE following three types of bowel preparation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled study. Two-hundred ninety-one patients underwent one of the following preparations: 4 L of clear liquids (CL) (group A; 92 patients); 90 mL of aqueous sodium phosphate (group B; 89 patients); or 4 L of a polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution (group C; 92 patients). The degree of cleanliness of the small bowel was classified by blinded examiners according to four categories (excellent, good, fair or poor). The degree of patient satisfaction, gastric and small bowel transit times, and diagnostic yield were measured. RESULTS: The degree of cleanliness did not differ significantly between the groups (P = 0.496). Interobserver concordance was fair (k = 0.38). No significant differences were detected between the diagnostic yields of the CE (P = 0.601). Gastric transit time was 35.7 +/- 3.7 min (group A), 46.1 +/- 8.6 min (group B) and 34.6 +/- 5.0 min (group C) (P = 0.417). Small-intestinal transit time was 276.9 +/- 10.7 min (group A), 249.7 +/- 13.1 min (group B) and 245.6 +/- 11.6 min (group C) (P = 0.120). CL was the best tolerated preparation. Compliance with the bowel preparation regimen was lowest in group C (P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: A clear liquid diet and overnight fasting is sufficient to achieve an adequate level of cleanliness and is better tolerated by patients than other forms of preparation.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherSpringeres_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.subjectCapsule endoscopyes_ES
dc.subjectGastrointestinal transites_ES
dc.subjectIntestine, smalles_ES
dc.titleEvaluation of different bowel preparations for small bowel capsule endoscopy: a prospective, randomized, controlled studyes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10620-011-1693-zes_ES

Files in This Item:
Thumbnail
File
Dig Dis Sci.2011.2900.pdf
Description
Size
84.22 kB
Format
Adobe PDF


Statistics and impact
0 citas en
0 citas en

Items in Dadun are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.