Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorGarcia-Yoldi, D. (David)-
dc.creatorFleche, P. (Philippe) le-
dc.creatorMiguel, M.J. (María Jesús) de-
dc.creatorMuñoz, P. (Pilar)-
dc.creatorBlasco, J.M. (J. M.)-
dc.creatorCvetnic, Z. (Zeljko)-
dc.creatorMarin, C.M. (C. M.)-
dc.creatorVergnaud, G. (Gilles)-
dc.creatorLopez-Goñi, I. (Ignacio)-
dc.date.accessioned2013-07-02T08:27:11Z-
dc.date.available2013-07-02T08:27:11Z-
dc.date.issued2007-
dc.identifier.citationGarcia-Yoldi D, Le Fleche P, De Miguel MJ, Munoz PM, Blasco JM, Cvetnic Z, et al. Comparison of multiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis with other PCR-based methods for typing Brucella suis isolates. J Clin Microbiol 2007 Dec;45(12):4070-4072.es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0095-1137-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10171/29473-
dc.description.abstractMultiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis (MLVA), multiplex PCR, and PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis were compared for typing Brucella suis isolates. A perfect concordance was obtained among these molecular assays. However, MLVA was the only method to demonstrate brucellosis outbreaks and to confirm that wildlife is a reservoir for zoonotic brucellosis.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherAmerican Society for Microbiologyes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.subjectPolymorphismes_ES
dc.subjectAssayes_ES
dc.subjectMelitensises_ES
dc.subjectAbortuses_ES
dc.subjectMarkerses_ES
dc.subjectStraines_ES
dc.subjectSwinees_ES
dc.titleComparison of multiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis with other PCR-based methods for typing Brucella suis isolateses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES

Files in This Item:
Thumbnail
File
Comparison of multiple-locus.pdf
Description
Size
273.63 kB
Format
Adobe PDF


Statistics and impact
0 citas en
0 citas en

Items in Dadun are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.