La filosofía analítica y la encíclica "Fides et ratio"

Moros-Claramunt, E. (Enrique)

Registro completo de metadatos

Aparece en las colecciones:

DA - Eclesiástica de Filosofía - Artículos de Revista
REV - AF - 1999, vol. 32, n. 3

Campo DC	Valor	Lengua/Idioma
dc.creator	Moros-Claramunt, E. (Enrique)	es_ES
dc.date.accessioned	2004-11-30T10:12:11Z	es_ES
dc.date.accessioned	2007-03-08T16:39:24Z	-
dc.date.available	2004-11-30T10:12:11Z	es_ES
dc.date.available	2007-03-08T16:39:24Z	-
dc.date.issued	1999	es_ES
dc.identifier.citation	Anuario Filosófico 1999 (32), 697-724	es_ES
dc.identifier.issn	0066-5215	es_ES
dc.identifier.uri	https://hdl.handle.net/10171/417	-
dc.description.abstract	The criticism of Bernstein on the encyclical Fides et ratio, claiming that it does not take into account the progress made by the best philosophies of this Century on the analysis of truth, is false. This paper show that the encyclical does take into account the achievements of analytical epistemology. Also it says that the even challenges analytical philosophy to deal with even more important issues such as the role of metaphysics in the analysis of human knowledge and conceptual language.	es_ES
dc.format.extent	238592 bytes	es_ES
dc.format.extent	238592 bytes	-
dc.format.extent	120760 bytes	-
dc.format.extent	1892 bytes	-
dc.format.mimetype	application/msword	es_ES
dc.format.mimetype	application/msword	-
dc.format.mimetype	application/pdf	-
dc.format.mimetype	text/plain	-
dc.language.iso	spa	es_ES
dc.rights	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess	es_ES
dc.subject	Fe	es_ES
dc.subject	Bernstein, Richard J.	es_ES
dc.subject	Neopositivismo	es_ES
dc.subject	Filosofía analítica	es_ES
dc.subject	Lingüística	es_ES
dc.subject	Epistemología	es_ES
dc.title	La filosofía analítica y la encíclica "Fides et ratio"	es_ES
dc.type	info:eu-repo/semantics/article	es_ES
dc.identifier.doi	10.15581/009.32.29566	es_ES