Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.creatorGeorge, M. I. (Marie I.)-
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-23T08:37:45Z-
dc.date.available2017-01-23T08:37:45Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationGeorge, M. I. (2016). Evolution in Court. A Federal Judge Defines Science. Scientia et Fides 4, Nº 2, pp. 397-415es_ES
dc.identifier.issn2353-5636-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10171/42855-
dc.description.abstractThis article highlights certain recurring themes in Mariano Artigas’s works by examining a judicial decision made in the United States in 1982 concerning the teaching of “creation-science” alongside “evolution-science” in public schools. These themes include: the proper delimitation of the boundaries of science, the importance of philosophy as a bridge between science and religion, and the misunderstandings concerning the limits of science inherent in scientism.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherServicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarraes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.subjectScientismes_ES
dc.subjectPhilosophy as bridgees_ES
dc.subjectFalsifiabilityes_ES
dc.subjectCreation-sciencees_ES
dc.titleEvolution in Court. A Federal Judge Defines Sciencees_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES

Ficheros en este ítem:
Vista previa
Fichero
07.pdf
Descripción
Tamaño
219.38 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF


Estadísticas e impacto
0 citas en
0 citas en

Los ítems de Dadun están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.