Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorSiouta, N. (Naouma)-
dc.creatorVan Beek, K. (Karen)-
dc.creatorvan der Eerden, M. (Marlieke)-
dc.creatorPreston, N. (Nancy)-
dc.creatorHasselaar, J. (Jeroen)-
dc.creatorHughes, S. (Sean)-
dc.creatorGarralda, E. (Eduardo)-
dc.creatorCenteno, C. (Carlos)-
dc.creatorCsikos, A. (Agnes)-
dc.creatorGroot, M. (M.)-
dc.creatorRadbruch, L. (Lukas)-
dc.creatorPayne, S. (Sheila)-
dc.creatorMenten, J. (Johan)-
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-23T11:38:35Z-
dc.date.available2017-02-23T11:38:35Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationSiouta, Naouma et al. 2016. “Integrated Palliative Care in Europe: A Qualitative Systematic Literature Review of Empirically-Tested Models in Cancer and Chronic Disease.” BMC Palliative Care 15(1):56.es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1472-684X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10171/43015-
dc.description.abstractIntegrated Palliative Care (PC) strategies are often implemented following models, namely standardized designs that provide frameworks for the organization of care for people with a progressive life-threatening illness and/or for their (in)formal caregivers. The aim of this qualitative systematic review is to identify empirically-evaluated models of PC in cancer and chronic disease in Europe. Further, develop a generic framework that will consist of the basis for the design of future models for integrated PC in Europe. Methods: Cochrane, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, AMED, BNI, Web of Science, NHS Evidence. Five journals and references from included studies were hand-searched. Two reviewers screened the search results. Studies with adult patients with advanced cancer/chronic disease from 1995 to 2013 in Europe, in English, French, German, Dutch, Hungarian or Spanish were included. A narrative synthesis was used. Results: 14 studies were included, 7 models for chronic disease, 4 for integrated care in oncology, 2 for both cancer and chronic disease and 2 for end-of-life pathways. The results show a strong agreement on the benefits of the involvement of a PC multidisciplinary team: better symptom control, less caregiver burden, improvement in continuity and coordination of care, fewer admissions, cost effectiveness and patients dying in their preferred place. Conclusion: Based on our findings, a generic framework for integrated PC in cancer and chronic disease is proposed. This framework fosters integration of PC in the disease trajectory concurrently with treatment and identifies the importance of employing a PC-trained multidisciplinary team with a threefold focus: treatment, consulting and training.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship“InSup-C, Patient-centered integrated palliative care pathways in advanced cancer and chronic disease”, is funded by the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/HEALTH, under grant agreement 305555)es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherBioMed Centrales_ES
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/305555-
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.subjectChronic diseasees_ES
dc.subjectDelivery of health carees_ES
dc.subjectMedical oncologyes_ES
dc.subjectPalliative carees_ES
dc.subjectReviewes_ES
dc.subjectMaterias Investigacion::Ciencias de la Salud::Oncologíaes_ES
dc.titleIntegrated palliative care in Europe: a qualitative systematic literature review of empirically-tested models in cancer and chronic diseasees_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.description.noteCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-016-0130-7es_ES

Files in This Item:
Thumbnail
File
Atlantes_2016_BMC_Europe.pdf
Description
Size
605.91 kB
Format
Adobe PDF


Statistics and impact

Items in Dadun are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.