Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.creator | Vijgen, J. (Jörgen) | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-10-11T07:55:03Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-10-11T07:55:03Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Vijgen, J. (Jörgen). "Soul or Brain: A False Dilemma? The Thomist Perspective". Scientia et Fides. 5 (2), 2017, 71 - 86 | es |
dc.identifier.issn | 2353-5636 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10171/44009 | - |
dc.description.abstract | In this article I will claim that from a Thomist perspective the question “Soul or Brain: What makes us human?” presents us with a false dilemma and hence must as such remain an unanswerable question. In order to corroborate this claim I will do two things. First, I present the framework of a Thomistic anthropology in so far as it relates to the unity of soul and body in the human person. Next, I deal with the question that immediately results from this unity, i.e. the subsistence of the soul. From a Thomist perspective this question can be answered apart from any findings from neuroscience. | es_ES |
dc.language.iso | eng | es_ES |
dc.publisher | Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra | es_ES |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es_ES |
dc.subject | Thomas Aquinas | es_ES |
dc.subject | anthropology | es_ES |
dc.subject | soul | es_ES |
dc.subject | body | es_ES |
dc.title | Soul or Brain: A False Dilemma? The Thomist Perspective | es_ES |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
dadun.citation.endingPage | 86 | es_ES |
dadun.citation.number | 2 | es_ES |
dadun.citation.publicationName | Scientia et Fides | es_ES |
dadun.citation.startingPage | 71 | es_ES |
dadun.citation.volume | 5 | es_ES |
Files in This Item:
Statistics and impact
Items in Dadun are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.