Full metadata record
Appears in Collections:
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorWalton, R.J. (Roberto J.)
dc.date.accessioned2009-10-21T09:39:15Z-
dc.date.available2009-10-21T09:39:15Z-
dc.date.issued2004-
dc.identifier.citationAnuario Filosófico, 2004 (37), 197 - 240es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10171/4527-
dc.description.abstractAccording to Husserl, oppositions pertaining to horizonedness provide the grounding for kinds of judgment. The first part of the article shows how the contrast inner/outer horizon develops into two distinct types of judgment, and how modality and generality refer back to the contrast indeterminateness/determinatess. The second part deals with the role of the opposition emptiness/ fulfillment in the process of making judgments distinct and clear. The third part argues that a material apophantics must be worked out in respect of situational truths, and shows how a general syntaxis underlies not only judgments but all spheres of behaviour.es_ES
dc.language.isospaes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.subjectHusserl, Edmundes_ES
dc.subjectjuicioes_ES
dc.subjectLógicaes_ES
dc.subjecthorizontees_ES
dc.titleHorizonticidad y juicioes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES

Files in This Item:
File: 
7. aWalton.pdf
Description: 
Size: 
229,54 kB
Format: 
Adobe PDF


Items in Dadun are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.