Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.creator | Walton, R.J. (Roberto J.) | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2009-10-21T09:39:15Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2009-10-21T09:39:15Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2004 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Anuario Filosófico, 2004 (37), 197 - 240 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10171/4527 | - |
dc.description.abstract | According to Husserl, oppositions pertaining to horizonedness provide the grounding for kinds of judgment. The first part of the article shows how the contrast inner/outer horizon develops into two distinct types of judgment, and how modality and generality refer back to the contrast indeterminateness/determinatess. The second part deals with the role of the opposition emptiness/ fulfillment in the process of making judgments distinct and clear. The third part argues that a material apophantics must be worked out in respect of situational truths, and shows how a general syntaxis underlies not only judgments but all spheres of behaviour. | es_ES |
dc.language.iso | spa | es_ES |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es_ES |
dc.subject | Husserl, Edmund | es_ES |
dc.subject | juicio | es_ES |
dc.subject | Lógica | es_ES |
dc.subject | horizonte | es_ES |
dc.title | Horizonticidad y juicio | es_ES |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.15581/009.37.29397 | es_ES |
Files in This Item:
Statistics and impact
Items in Dadun are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.