Full metadata record
Appears in Collections:
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorPippin, R.B. (Robert B.)
dc.date.accessioned2009-10-28T10:31:49Z-
dc.date.available2009-10-28T10:31:49Z-
dc.date.issued2004-
dc.identifier.citationAnuario Filosófico, 2004 (37), 595 - 630es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10171/4574-
dc.description.abstractKant says there is a duty to exit the state of nature, to enter into a civil state. He says this is a duty of right (Rechtspflicht), not a duty of virtue. The article discusses the argument he gives to support this view, as well as the contemporary discussion on the relationship between this duty of right and the categorical imperative. The discussion is full of implications. Particularly significant is the view of the Kantian state emerging from it, which challenges the conventional account: instead of a state designed to protect pre-existing individual property rights, property rights are seen as something resulting from the very constitution of the state.es_ES
dc.language.isospaes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.subjectKant, Immanueles_ES
dc.subjectestadoes_ES
dc.subjectnaturalezaes_ES
dc.subjectciviles_ES
dc.title¿Lo mío y lo tuyo? El estado kantianoes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.15581/009.37.29364es_ES

Files in This Item:
Thumbnail
File
PIPPIN.pdf
Description
Size
193.24 kB
Format
Adobe PDF


Statistics and impact
0 citas en
0 citas en

Items in Dadun are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.