Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.creator | Korsgaard, C.M. (Christine M.) | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2009-10-28T10:49:30Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2009-10-28T10:49:30Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2004 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Anuario Filosófico, 2004 (37), 645 - 677 | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10171/4577 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | What do we mean when we say we act “for a reason”? What is the connection between Reason, as a faculty, and the reasons of our actions? This article maintains that Aristotle and Kant had a similar answer to this question. Moreover: the answer they give can help us to clarify the controversy between moral realism and empiricism regarding the ontological and epistemological status of what we call the reason of an action. | es_ES |
| dc.language.iso | spa | es_ES |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Kant, Immanuel | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Acción | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Razón | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Aristóteles | es_ES |
| dc.title | Actuar por una razón | es_ES |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.15581/009.37.29366 | es_ES |
Files in This Item:
Statistics and impact
Items in Dadun are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
