Full metadata record
Appears in Collections:
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorPadial, J.J. (Juan José)
dc.date.accessioned2009-11-11T11:04:17Z-
dc.date.available2009-11-11T11:04:17Z-
dc.date.issued2005-
dc.identifier.citationAnuario Filosófico, 2005 (38), 269 - 277es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10171/4749-
dc.description.abstractThe Leibniz’s criticism to nominalism provides the metaphysic a more powerful (modal) logic rather than the extensional one of late-medieval period. At the same time he finds a prosecutive way of thinking that allows the systematization of the intelligibility. I maintain that on the formulation of Leibniz’s ontological argument, one can find the cognoscitive subject. Nevertheless, and in a similar way as Hegel, like Leibniz did not elaborate logic of productive action of inteligible possibility, the facticity introduces itself in the subjects of the monada and on the Self.es_ES
dc.language.isospaes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.subjectLeibniz, Gottfriedes_ES
dc.subjectHegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedriches_ES
dc.subjectposibilidades_ES
dc.subjectnominalismoes_ES
dc.subjectLógicaes_ES
dc.titleLa crítica hegeliana a las conversiones entre modos operadas por Leibnizes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES

Files in This Item:
File: 
PADIAL BUENO.pdf
Description: 
Size: 
51,91 kB
Format: 
Adobe PDF


Items in Dadun are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.