Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.creator | Sanfélix, V. (Vicente) | es_ES |
dc.date.accessioned | 2005-02-21T17:26:36Z | es_ES |
dc.date.accessioned | 2007-03-08T16:37:53Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2005-02-21T17:26:36Z | es_ES |
dc.date.available | 2007-03-08T16:37:53Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 1995 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.citation | Anuario Filosófico, 1995 (28), 311-333 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.issn | 0066-5215 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10171/558 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Cartesianism was always a subject to Wittgenstein's criticism. In his case against it, he employed a general strategy that I have called "Reductio ad vacuum". There is something right in Cartesianism but without a hidden confusing premise, the truth of Cartesianism is empty. According to the early Wittgenstein, Cartesianism was right be-cause Solipsism is true: the Self is the center of the world. But without confusing this metaphysical Self with the psychological one, Solipsism becomes empty and no different from Realism. | es_ES |
dc.format.extent | 77245 bytes | es_ES |
dc.format.extent | 50967 bytes | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/msword | es_ES |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.language.iso | spa | es_ES |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es_ES |
dc.title | Reductio ad vacuum | es_ES |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.15581/009.28.29815 | es_ES |
Files in This Item:
Statistics and impact
Items in Dadun are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.