Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.creatorAldaz, A. (Azucena)-
dc.creatorIdoate-Grijalba, A. I. (Ana Isabel)-
dc.creatorOrtega-Eslava, A. (Ana)-
dc.creatorAquerreta, I. (Irene)-
dc.creatorMonedero, P. (Pablo)-
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-17T12:56:24Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-17T12:56:24Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationAldaz, A. (Azucena); Idoate-Grijalba, A. I. (Ana Isabel); Ortega, A. (Ana); et al. "Effectiveness of pharmacokinetic/ pharmacodynamic-guided meropenem treatment in critically ill patients: A comparative cohort study". Therapeutic drug monitoring. 43 (2), 2021, 256 - 263es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1536-3694-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10171/68405-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The proper dosage of antibiotics is a key element in the effective treatment of infection, especially in critically ill patients. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of optimized meropenem regimens based on pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic criteria in patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Methods: This observational, naturalistic, retrospective, unicentric cohort study was performed between May 2011 and December 2017. The clinical and bacteriologic responses of 77 control intensive care unit patients receiving meropenem were compared with those of 77 propensity score-balanced patients who received meropenem dose adjusted by therapeutic drug monitoring. The primary end point of clinical response was a reduction at the end of treatment of at least 80% of the maximum procalcitonin (PCT) value recorded during the meropenem treatment. Results: The primary end point was met by 55 patients (71.4%) in the adjusted group compared with 41 (53.3%) patients in the control group (mean difference 18.1%, P = 0.02). Fifty-one patients (66.2%) in the adjusted group required a meropenem dose adjustment, being necessary in 46 of them (90.2%) to decrease the dose. The reduction of PCT was the greatest in the adjusted group compared with the unadjusted group (93% versus 85%, P = 0.004); a greater percentage of patients reached a PCT level < 0.5 ng/mL (63.6% versus 41.6%, P = 0.006), and there was a trend toward an improved bacteriologic response (relative risk = 1.27; 95% confidence interval: 0.92-1.56). There were no differences in early mortality or safety between groups. Conclusions: Adjustment of meropenem therapy by monitoring is a useful strategy for improving meropenem effectiveness in the treatment of infection in critically ill patients, with no impact on safety.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherWolters Kluweres_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccesses_ES
dc.subjectMeropenemes_ES
dc.subjectPharmacokineticses_ES
dc.subjectEffectivenesses_ES
dc.subjectSafetyes_ES
dc.subjectProcalcitonines_ES
dc.titleEffectiveness of pharmacokinetic / pharmacodynamic-guided meropenem treatment in critically ill patients: A comparative cohort studyes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/FTD.0000000000000826-
dadun.citation.endingPage263es_ES
dadun.citation.number2es_ES
dadun.citation.publicationNameTherapeutic drug monitoringes_ES
dadun.citation.startingPage256es_ES
dadun.citation.volume43es_ES
dc.identifier.pmid33149053-

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero
Effectiveness of pharmacokinetic........2021.pdf
Descripción
Tamaño
112.04 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF


Estadísticas e impacto

Los ítems de Dadun están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.