Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorBernad-Alonso, I. (Isabel)-
dc.creatorAguado, L. (Leyre)-
dc.creatorNuñez-Cordoba, J.M. (Jorge M.)-
dc.creatorRedondo-Bellón, P. (Pedro)-
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-29T12:36:34Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-29T12:36:34Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationBernad-Alonso, I. (Isabel); Aguado, L. (Leyre); Nuñez-Cordoba, J.M. (Jorge M.); et al. "Daylight photodynamic therapy for prevention of new actinic keratosis and keratinocyte carcinomas in organ transplants. A cryotherapy-controlled randomized clinical trial". JEADV. 34, 2020, 1464 - 1470es
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10171/68614-
dc.description.abstractBackground Organ transplant recipients (OTR) have a higher risk of actinic keratosis (AK) and keratinocyte carcinomas (KC). There are no clinical trials assessing the effectiveness of daylight photodynamic therapy (DPDT) to prevent new AK and KC in OTR. Objectives To determine whether repeated treatments of field cancerization with DPDT are effective in preventing new AK and KC in OTR. Methods A randomized, intra-subject controlled, evaluator-blind, split-face and/or scalp trial, from April 2016 to Octo- ber 2018. Participants were OTR older than 18 years, 1-year posttransplant, with at least 5 AK on each hemi-face/ hemi-scalp. One side received six field treatments with DPDT: two sessions 15 days apart at baseline, two at 3 months and two at 9 months after baseline. Control side received lesion-directed treatment with cryotherapy (double freeze– thaw) at baseline, 3 and 9 months. Total number of lesions (AK and KC) at 21 months, number of new AK and KC at 3, 9, 15 and 21 months and treatment preferences were analysed. Results Of 24 men included, 23 were analysed at 3 months; and 21, at 9, 15 and 21 months. Mean (SD) age was 69.8 years (9.2). The total number of lesions at 21 months was 4.7 (4.3) for DPDT and 5.8 (5.0) for control side; P = 0.09. DPDT showed significantly lower means [SD] of new lesions compared to control side at 3 months (4.2 [3.4] vs. 6.8 [4.8]; P < 0.001), 9 months (3.0 [3.3] vs. 4.3 [3.4]; P = 0.04) and 15 months (3.0 [4.6] vs. 4.8 [5.0]; P = 0.02), and non-signifi- cant at 21 months (3.7 [3.5] vs. 5.0 [4.5]; P = 0.06). Most participants preferred DPDT. Conclusion DPDT showed potential effectiveness in preventing new AK and KC in OTR by consecutive treatments of field cancerization. The preference for DPDT could facilitate adherence to the long-term treatment necessary in these patients.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThe study received funding support from Galderma Laboratories, LP. France. The funder had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis and interpretation of the data; preparation, review or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherEuropean Academy of Dermatology and Venereologyes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccesses_ES
dc.subjectMaterias Investigacion::Ciencias de la Salud::Dermatologíaes_ES
dc.subjectDaylight photodynamic therapyes_ES
dc.subjectActinic keratosises_ES
dc.subjectKeratinocyte carcinomases_ES
dc.subjectOrgan transplantses_ES
dc.subjectCryotherapy-controlled randomized clinical triales_ES
dc.titleDaylight photodynamic therapy for prevention of new actinic keratosis and keratinocyte carcinomas in organ transplants. A cryotherapy-controlled randomized clinical triales_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jdv.16125-
dadun.citation.endingPage1470es_ES
dadun.citation.publicationNameJEADVes_ES
dadun.citation.startingPage1464es_ES
dadun.citation.volume34es_ES

Files in This Item:
File
Acad Dermatol Venereol - 2019 - Bernad - Daylight photodynamic therapy for prevention of new actinic keratosis and.pdf
Description
Size
196.83 kB
Format
Adobe PDF


Statistics and impact
0 citas en
0 citas en

Items in Dadun are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.