Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.creator | Luján-Colás, J. (Juan) | - |
dc.creator | Tuero, C. (Carlota) | - |
dc.creator | Landecho, M.F. (Manuel F.) | - |
dc.creator | Moncada, R. (Rafael) | - |
dc.creator | Álvarez-Cienfuegos, J. (Javier) | - |
dc.creator | Rotellar, F. (Fernando) | - |
dc.creator | Silva, C. (Camilo) | - |
dc.creator | Lapuente, F. (Fernando) | - |
dc.creator | Martínez, P. (P.) | - |
dc.creator | Frühbeck, G. (Gema) | - |
dc.creator | Valenti, V. (Víctor) | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-02-09T13:45:56Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-02-09T13:45:56Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Luján, J. (Juan); Tuero, C. (Carlota); Landecho, M.F. (Manuel F.); et al. "Impact of Routine and Long-Term Follow-Up on Weight Loss after Bariatric Surgery". Obesity Surgery. 30 (11), 2020, 4293 - 4299 | es |
dc.identifier.issn | 0960-8923 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10171/69006 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Weight loss after bariatric surgery varies among patients. Patients who do not complete long-term follow-up are considered to loose less weight than those with regular follow-up visits. Objective: To evaluate the influence of patients' follow-up compliance on long-term excess weight loss (%EWL) and total weight loss (%TWL) after bariatric surgery, comparing results between gastric bypass (GB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG). Methods: Patients with up to 5 years of follow-up data after bariatric surgery were included in this retrospective analysis. Patients were divided in 2 groups: those in group 1 who had attended every scheduled postoperative appointment and those in group 2 who had been lost to follow-up before 1 year and were later contacted by telephone. %EWL and %TWL were compared to determine the possible relationship between type of surgery and regularity of the follow-up. Results: A total of 385 patients were included. A significant difference in EWL was observed at 5 years in the SG group (78% for group 1 versus 39% for group 2; p = 0.02) and GB group (75% for group 1 versus 62% for group 2; p = 0.01). No significant differences between surgeries were found when comparing long-term EWL in group 1 patients 77% for SG versus 75% for GB. For group 2 patients, GB achieved greater EWL than SG; p = 0.005. %TWL patients in group 2 showed significant differences in all periods of study (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Bariatric surgery patients who attended all scheduled follow-up appointments experienced significantly greater long-term EWL and TWL than those who did not. GB has apparent increased benefits for weight loss in long-term follow-up when compared with SG for patients who did not attend long-term follow-up. Therefore, continued long-term follow-up of bariatric patients should be encouraged to increase postoperative weight loss results. | es_ES |
dc.language.iso | eng | es_ES |
dc.publisher | Springer | es_ES |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | es_ES |
dc.subject | Bariatric surgery | es_ES |
dc.subject | Long-term follow-up | es_ES |
dc.title | Impact of Routine and Long-Term Follow-Up on Weight Loss after Bariatric Surgery | es_ES |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s11695-020-04788-7 | - |
dadun.citation.endingPage | 4299 | es_ES |
dadun.citation.number | 11 | es_ES |
dadun.citation.publicationName | Obesity Surgery | es_ES |
dadun.citation.startingPage | 4293 | es_ES |
dadun.citation.volume | 30 | es_ES |
Files in This Item:
Statistics and impact
Items in Dadun are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.