Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.creator | Ortiz-de-Landázuri, C. (Carlos) | es_ES |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2005-05-27T15:14:13Z | es_ES |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2007-03-08T16:40:19Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2005-05-27T15:14:13Z | es_ES |
| dc.date.available | 2007-03-08T16:40:19Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2001 | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.citation | Anuario Filosófico, 2001 (34), 75-100 | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0066-5215 | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10171/763 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | The fallibilism of Peirce and Popper admits a process of im-provement, without skepticism or relativism, as the radical post-modernism of some of their followers suggests. However Karl-Otto Apel across their intellectual life have shown that meliorism is very different in both authors: Popper justifies his position by a methodological decisionism, whereas Peirce justifies his approach by a transcendental pragmatic foundation, which is the only valid according to Apel. | es_ES |
| dc.format.extent | 105472 bytes | es_ES |
| dc.format.extent | 105472 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 114633 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 1892 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/msword | es_ES |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/msword | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | - |
| dc.language.iso | spa | es_ES |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es_ES |
| dc.title | Dos melioristas: ¿Decisionismo metodológico o ética de las creencias? | es_ES |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.15581/009.34.29508 | es_ES |
Files in This Item:
Statistics and impact
Items in Dadun are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
