REV - AF - 2018, vol. 51, n. 2
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/10171/42832
See
Results
- STALMASZCZYK, PIOTR (ED.), Philosophy and Logic of Predication, Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main, 2017, 273 pp. [RECENSIÓN](Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra, 2018) Pérez-Ilzarbe, P. (Paloma)
- SOTO-BRUNA, MARÍA JESÚS Y CORSO DE ESTRADA, LAURA (EDS.), Vox naturae, vox rationis. Conocer la naturaleza, la causa y la ley en la Edad Media y la Modernidad Clásica, G. Olms, Hildesheim, 2016, 291 pp. [RECENSIÓN](Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra, 2018) Vergara-Ross, A.E. (Andrés E.)
- SINGER, PETER, Ética para el mundo real. 83 artículos sobre cosas que importan, Antoni Bosch Editor, Barcelona, 2017, 365 pp. [RECENSIÓN](Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra, 2018) Llauce-Ontaneda C.M. (Cynthia Melissa)
- El suplemento de la imaginación en la narración. O de cómo Husserl aporta un complemento a la perspectiva de Ricoeur(Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra, 2018) Vandevelde, P. (Pol)I apply Edmund Husserl’s notion of “phantasma”, which he sees as the support for pure imagination, to Ricoeur’s understanding of a narrative of real facts or events. I argue, first, that the phantasma, which plays in pure imagination the same role as sensations in perception, allows us to visualize and experience what is recounted in a narrative; and, second, that this phantasma is analogous to the sensations of perceptions that observers had of these facts and events. This component of imagination in a narrative is precisely what allows a narrative to render facts and events “as they really happened.”
- RODRÍGUEZ VALLS, FRANCISCO, Orígenes del hombre. La singularidad del ser humano, Biblioteca Nueva, Madrid, 2017, 208 pp. [RECENSIÓN](Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra, 2018) Ballester-Corres, R. (Roberto)
- El poder de visualizar. La «phantasia» según Aristóteles(Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra, 2018) Alloa, E. (Emmanuel)When translating phantasia as ‘imagination’, one commits a dangerous anachronism: interpreting the Greek concept from the vantage point of a modern, post-Kantian framework which sees imagination as a faculty mediating between sensibility and reasoning. A close reading of the Aristotelian sources shows why phantasia cannot be identified as a distinct faculty, but rather designates a transversal power common to all psychic acts. The article argues that a more adequate translation of phantasia would be ‘visualization’.
- ATKINS, RICHARD KENNETH, Peirce and the Conduct of Life. Sentiment and Instinct in Ethics and Religion, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2016, 231 pp. [RESEÑA](Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra, 2018) Ortiz-de-Landázuri, C. (Carlos)
- De los objetos impelentes. ¿Quién iba a imaginarlos? Contribución a una fenomenología de la imaginación como configuración de escenas(Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra, 2018) Moreno-Márquez, C. (César)The present article explores the phenomenological relevance of the imagination, taking as a guiding principle the meaning-more (intending beyond itself) of the horizon-intentionality, emphasizing an extreme modality of this intentionality, which highlights a horizon of overindetermination, decisive for understanding the phenomenological relevance of the impelling objects, which do not only refer-to, but also allow a creative expansion of the horizon of phenomenality, with view to the encounter between phenomenology and literary experience.
- Husserl and Dufrenne on the temporalization of the pictorial space(Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra, 2018) Carreño-Cobos, J.E. (Javier Enrique)Already with Husserl phenomenology seeks to address the many faces and manifestations of time, including the appearance of time in images. The critical question, however, is how such a manifestation is at all possible. In our paper we consider Husserl’s and Dufrenne’s answers to this question. It will be found that their positions not only share much in common, but they complement one another, with Husserl’s refinements on the issue of image consciousness revealing still more ways of experiencing time in images.
- Phantasms and physical imagination in Husserl’s theory of pictorialization(Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra, 2018) Mion, R.N. (Regina-Nino)The aim of the article is to argue against the claim that Edmund Husserl does not adequately distinguish physical imagination from phantasy in his early texts. Thus, the article examines Husserl’s early theory of imagination according to which phantasy and image consciousness (understood as physical imagination) have similar structure of pictorialization but they differ with respect to apprehension contents and the number of apprehended objects: phantasy involves phantasms and two apprehended objects but physical imagination involves sensations and have three apprehended objects.