LIBRARY
  • [0]
    •  

    Buselli-Mondin, P. (Paola)

    Filtering

    2006 - 200922010 - 20201

    Settings

    Author search.filters.isAuthorOfPublication.2bc38f25-0141-4d25-be2f-752843b76fd7

    Search Results

    Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
    • Thumbnail Image
      Osservazioni sull'esistenza giuridica della sentenza canonica
      (Instituto Martín Azpilicueta, 2006) Buselli-Mondin, P. (Paola)
      Beginning with a comparison between the canon and secular legal systems, we have an in-depth investigation of the idea of legal existence, both in its possible autonomous configuration within the general context of the invalidity of the Canon Law act, and also in its specific application to Canon Sentence. After a synthesis of the positions which doctrine and jurisprudence have taken on the matter, the legal existence in the convergence of the judicial approach of Olis Robleda with the personalist phenomenology of Karol Wojtyla is identified. Within this convergence, the identification of a personalist subjectivity which implies the general breadth of the responsibilities of the faithful in ordering the...
    • Thumbnail Image
      La enseñanza de la religión en el contexto multirreligioso. La educación religiosa como instrumento de protección del menor: ¿qué relevancia jurídica tiene?
      (Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra, 2020) Buselli-Mondin, P. (Paola)
      The context for this analysis is a study carried out in Italy which concluded that the teaching of the Catholic religion at school may be adapted to current religious pluralism only through a new methodological approach; a hermeneuticexistential renewal that, although typical of the teaching of the Catholic religion in Italy, may be seen as paradigmatic for three reasons. Firstly, because it is capable of comparing various religious confessions without erasing or reinforcing their differences. Secondly, because it respects the historical roots and social value attributed to religion in all states, bearing in mind that the challenge of religious multiculturalism cannot be reduced to which religion is to play a role in the public sphere, but consists of identifying which religion has the appropriate cultural weight to ground constructive interreligious dialogue. Thirdly, because it can also foster legal reflection on the religious identity of each citizen and on their religious duties.
    • Thumbnail Image
      L'assenza della forma canonica preclude l'operatività del processo di nullità matrimoniale? Un'ipotesi
      (Instituto Martin de Azpilcueta, 2007) Buselli-Mondin, P. (Paola)
      El sistema canónico actual parece no excluir la praxis de hacer operativo el proceso de nulidad matrimonial también en relación con matrimonios que los católicos hayan celebrado entre ellos sin observar la forma canónica. En particular, la 'justa causa' del proceso, en el caso, vendrá identificada por el hecho de que dos católicos están 'unidos en matrimonio' entre ellos, y en tal sentido opera el actual aprecio jurídico de tres figuras, cuya dimensión unitiva parece justificar precisamente el ejercicio de la potestad jurisdiccional sobre matrimonios que los católicos han celebrado sin observar la forma canónica. La primera es la función renovada que ha de reconocerse a la forma canónica en la nueva legislación ('conditio iuris' de validez pero no de existencia del matrimonio). Los otros dos elementos considerados para justificar el ejercicio de la potestad jurisdiccional en el caso son: la dimensión renovada, dinámica y participada, de la pertenencia eclesial y la renovada dimensión pastoral del proceso canónico. Por su parte, el 'fumus boni iuris' de la demanda judicial vendrá identificado por el hecho de que dos católicos han elegido precisamente 'celebrar su matrimonio', de modo conforme a un rito matrimonial institucionalizado. ------ The actual canonical system does not seem to exclude the praxis of making operative the process of matrimonial nullity in relation with the marriages that Catholics may have celebrated without observing the canonical form. In particular, the 'just cause' of the process, in the case, will be identified by the fact that two Catholics are 'united in marriage', and in that sense, the actual juridical appraisal of the three figures operates, the unitive dimension of which seems to justify precisely the exercise of the jurisdictional power about marriages that Catholics have celebrated without observing the canonical form. The first one is the renewed function that has to be recognized to the canonical form in the new legislation ('conditio iuris' of the validity but not of the existence of marriage). The other two elements considered to justify the exercise of the jurisdictional power in the case are: the renewed, dynamic and participated dimension of the ecclesial affiliation and the renewed pastoral dimension of the canonical procedure. For its part, the 'fumus boni iuris' of the petition will be identified by the fact that two Catholics have opted precisely to celebrate their marriage, in a manner which conforms to the institutionalised marriage rite.