Siouta, N. (Naouma)

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    Integrated palliative care in Europe: a qualitative systematic literature review of empirically-tested models in cancer and chronic disease
    (BioMed Central, 2016) Menten, J. (Johan); Hughes, S. (Sean); van der Eerden, M. (Marlieke); Payne, S. (Sheila); Garralda, E. (Eduardo); Hasselaar, J. (Jeroen); Centeno, C. (Carlos); Csikos, A. (Agnes); Siouta, N. (Naouma); Radbruch, L. (Lukas); Preston, N. (Nancy); Groot, M. (M.); Van Beek, K. (Karen)
    Integrated Palliative Care (PC) strategies are often implemented following models, namely standardized designs that provide frameworks for the organization of care for people with a progressive life-threatening illness and/or for their (in)formal caregivers. The aim of this qualitative systematic review is to identify empirically-evaluated models of PC in cancer and chronic disease in Europe. Further, develop a generic framework that will consist of the basis for the design of future models for integrated PC in Europe. Methods: Cochrane, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, AMED, BNI, Web of Science, NHS Evidence. Five journals and references from included studies were hand-searched. Two reviewers screened the search results. Studies with adult patients with advanced cancer/chronic disease from 1995 to 2013 in Europe, in English, French, German, Dutch, Hungarian or Spanish were included. A narrative synthesis was used. Results: 14 studies were included, 7 models for chronic disease, 4 for integrated care in oncology, 2 for both cancer and chronic disease and 2 for end-of-life pathways. The results show a strong agreement on the benefits of the involvement of a PC multidisciplinary team: better symptom control, less caregiver burden, improvement in continuity and coordination of care, fewer admissions, cost effectiveness and patients dying in their preferred place. Conclusion: Based on our findings, a generic framework for integrated PC in cancer and chronic disease is proposed. This framework fosters integration of PC in the disease trajectory concurrently with treatment and identifies the importance of employing a PC-trained multidisciplinary team with a threefold focus: treatment, consulting and training.
  • Thumbnail Image
    To what degree is palliative care integrated in guidelines and pathways for adult cancer patients in Europe: a systematic literature review
    (BioMed Central, 2016) Hodiamont, F. (Farina); Menten, J. (Johan); Hughes, S. (Sean); van der Eerden, M. (Marlieke); Payne, S. (Sheila); Garralda, E. (Eduardo); Hasselaar, J. (Jeroen); Centeno, C. (Carlos); Csikos, A. (Agnes); Siouta, N. (Naouma); Radbruch, L. (Lukas); Preston, N. (Nancy); Radvanyi, I. (Ildiko); Van Beek, K. (Karen)
    Palliative Care (PC) aims to improve the quality of life for patients with cancer and their families and its benefits have been demonstrated by several studies. The objective of this systematic review is to assess the integration of PC in the content of guidelines/pathways of adult cancer patients in Europe. Methods We included studies of adult patients with cancer published from 01/01/1995 and 31/12/2013 in Europe in six languages. We searched nine electronic databases, hand-searched six journals and also performed citation tracking. Studies were ranked using Emanuel's Integrated Palliative Care (IPC) criteria, a tool containing 11 domains to assess PC content in guidelines. Two reviewers screened the results and narrative synthesis has been employed. Results We identified a total of 28,277 potentially relevant articles from which 637 were eligible for full-text screening. The final review included 60 guidelines and 14 pathways. Eighty percent (80 %) of the guidelines/pathways emphasize a holistic approach and 66 % focus on PC interventions aimed at reducing suffering. Fifty seven percent (57 %) did not discuss referral criteria for PC. Of all studies, five fulfilled at least 10/11 IPC criteria. Differences existed with regard to the referral criteria for bereavement care and the continuous adjustment of goals of care. Conclusion Overall, most of the identified guidelines/pathways highlighted the importance of the holistic approach of IPC. The studies that were found to fulfil at least 10/11 Emanuel's IPC criteria could serve as benchmarks of IPC.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Towards integration of palliative care in patients with chronic heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease:a systematic literature review of European guidelines and pathways
    (BioMed Central, 2016) Hodiamont, F. (Farina); Menten, J. (Johan); Hughes, S. (Sean); van der Eerden, M. (Marlieke); Payne, S. (Sheila); Garralda, E. (Eduardo); Hasselaar, J. (Jeroen); Centeno, C. (Carlos); Csikos, A. (Agnes); Busa, C. (Csilla); Siouta, N. (Naouma); Radbruch, L. (Lukas); Preston, N. (Nancy); Groot, M. (M.); Van Beek, K. (Karen)
    Despite the positive impact of Palliative Care (PC) on the quality of life for patients and their relatives, the implementation of PC in non-cancer health-care delivery in the EU seems scarcely addressed. The aim of this study is to assess guidelines/pathways for integrated PC in patients with advanced Chronic Heart Failure (CHF) and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) in Europe via a systematic literature review. Methods Search results were screened by two reviewers. Eligible studies of adult patients with CHF or COPD published between 01/01/1995 and 31/12/2013 in Europe in 6 languages were included. Nine electronic databases were searched, 6 journals were hand-searched and citation tracking was also performed. For the analysis, a narrative synthesis was employed. Results The search strategy revealed 26,256 studies without duplicates. From these, 19 studies were included in the review; 17 guidelines and 2 pathways. 18 out of 19 focused on suffering reduction interventions, 13/19 on a holistic approach and 15/19 on discussions of illness prognosis and limitations. The involvement of a PC team was mentioned in 13/19 studies, the assessment of the patients’ goals of care in 12/19 and the advance care planning in 11/19. Only 4/19 studies elaborated on aspects such as grief and bereavement care, 7/19 on treatment in the last hours of life and 8/19 on the continuation of goal adjustment. Conclusion The results illustrate that there is a growing awareness for the importance of integrated PC in patients with advanced CHF or COPD. At the same time, however, they signal the need for the development of standardized strategies so that existing barriers are alleviated.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Integrated palliative care in the Spanish context: a systematic review of the literature
    (BioMed Central, 2016) Menten, J. (Johan); Garralda, E. (Eduardo); Hasselaar, J. (Jeroen); Centeno, C. (Carlos); Csikos, A. (Agnes); Carrasco-Gimeno, J.M. (José Miguel); Siouta, N. (Naouma); Van Beek, K. (Karen)
    Abstract Background: Integrated palliative care (IPC) involves bringing together administrative, organisational, clinical and service aspects in order to achieve continuity of care between all actors involved in the care network of patients receiving palliative care (PC) services. The purpose of this study is to identify literature on IPC in the Spanish context, either in cancer or other advanced chronic diseases. Methods: Systematic review of the literature about IPC published in Spain between 1995 and 2013. Sources searched included PubMed, Cochrane Library, Cinahl, the national palliative care Journal (Medicina Paliativa), and Google. Evidence on IPC in care models, pathways, guidelines and other relevant documents were searched. Additionally, data were included from expert sources. Elements of IPC were considered based on the definition of IPC and the Emmanuel´s IPC tool. The main inclusion criterion was a comprehensive description of PC integration. Results: Out of a total of 2,416 titles screened, 49 were included. We found two models describing IPC interventions achieving continuity and appropriateness of care as a result, 12 guidelines or pathways (most of them with a general approach including cancer and non-cancer and showing a theoretical IPC inclusion as measured by Emmanuel’s tool) and 35 other significant documents as for their context relevance (17 health strategy documents, 14 analytical studies and 4 descriptive documents). These last documents comprised respectively: regional and national plans with an IPC inclusion evidence, studies focused on IPC into primary care and resource utilisation; and descriptions of fruitful collaboration programmes between PC teams and oncology departments. Conclusions: The results show that explications of IPC in the Spanish literature exist, but that there is insufficient evidence of its impact in clinical practice. This review may be of interest for Spanish-speaking countries and for others seeking to know the status of IPC in the literature in their home nations.