Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Repair
Export

Author(s)

Keywords

Materias Investigacion::Ciencias de la Salud::Urología y nefrología, Benign prostatic hyperplasia, Spain, Primary care, Urology clinics, Real-world therapeutic management

publication.page.relation

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to describe the real-world therapeutic management of patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperpla- sia (BPH) (LUTS/BPH) attending primary care and urology clinics in Spain. Methods: This observational, retrospective, multicentre study included men ≥50 years of age diagnosed with LUTS/BPH (≤8 years prior to study visit) (N = 670). Therapeutic management according to healthcare service (primary care vs. urology clinics) or progression criteria, proportion of patients with treatment change, patient profile according to therapy and evolution of LUTS severity were assessed. Results: Overall differences were noticed in the management of patients between healthcare service (P < .001) and with or without progression criteria (P < .05). Most patients received pharmacological treatment at diagnosis (70.7%; 474/670), which in- creased at study visit (81.6%; 547/670) with overall similar profiles between primary care and urology clinics for each therapy. α1-Blockers were the most used pharmaco- logical treatment across healthcare settings at diagnosis (61.8%; 293/474) and study visit (51%; 279/547). Only 27.1% (57/210) of patients with progression criteria at diag- nosis and 35.6% (99/278) at study visit received 5α-reductase inhibitor (5ARI) alone or in combination with a α1-blocker. Overall, most patients did not change treatment (60%; 402/670) with a trend of more patients worsening in symptoms when not re- ceiving α1-blocker plus 5ARI combination therapy. Conclusion: Most patients with LUTS/BPH received pharmacological treatment; however, most men with progression criteria did not receive a 5ARI alone or in combi- nation. These results support the need to reinforce both primary care and urologists existing clinical guideline recommendations for the appropriate medical management of patients with LUTS/BPH.

Note

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

Collections