Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorLópez, J.I. (José Ignacio)
dc.date.accessioned2011-03-28T17:17:56Z-
dc.date.available2011-03-28T17:17:56Z-
dc.date.issued2006-
dc.identifier.citationIUS CANONICUM, XLVI, N. 92, 2006, págs. 581-622es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0021-325X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10171/17278-
dc.description.abstractIn its last term 2005-2006, the United States Supreme Court (USSC) decided its first case regarding religious freedom under the Roberts Court on February 21, 2006. The USSC (Gonzales v. o Centro Espirita) applied again the doctrine of the strict scrutiny (Sherbert-Yoder), and affirmed the federal application of the RFRA '93. This controversy did not enter in the USSC's contradictions on the free exercise of religion. Thus, we have to wait a new USSC's decision that affirms the strict scrutiny (Sherbert) or the neutrality standard (Smith), overrulling one or another precedent and defining the doctrine of «free exercise exemptions». But, the «free exercise exemptions», are a legal or a constitutional...es_ES
dc.language.isospaes_ES
dc.publisherInstituto Martín Azpilicuetaes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.subjectMaterias Investigacion::Derecho canónicoes_ES
dc.subjectLibertad religiosaes_ES
dc.titleLa última aplicación de la doctrina norteamerica del «strict scrutiny» en el derecho de la libertad religiosa: González V. o Centro espiritistaes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.15581/016.46.14599es_ES

Files in This Item:
Thumbnail
File
23435574.pdf
Description
Size
153.39 kB
Format
Adobe PDF


Statistics and impact
0 citas en
0 citas en

Items in Dadun are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.