Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.creator | Casas, J. (José) | - |
| dc.creator | Conill-Sancho, J. (Jesús) | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2011-12-16T17:12:41Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2011-12-16T17:12:41Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2011 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Anuario Filosófico, 2011 (44/2), 225-230 | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0066-5215 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10171/20211 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | The notions ‘conservative’ and ‘progressive’ in social sciences and public opinion have given rise to two distinctive political ideologies. In this issue we deal, starting from Kant, with different historical senses of the notions of conservative and progressive in the social sciences as applied to the present: Buchanan’s constitutional economy, Popper’s open society, Rawl’s theory of justice and Ortega y Gasset’s philosophical conception of social and political life. | es_ES |
| dc.language.iso | spa | es_ES |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es_ES |
| dc.subject | conservador | es_ES |
| dc.subject | progresista | es_ES |
| dc.subject | ideología | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Filosofía social | es_ES |
| dc.title | Presentación | es_ES |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
| dc.type.driver | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.15581/009.44.1413 | es_ES |
Files in This Item:
Statistics and impact
Items in Dadun are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
