Full metadata record
Appears in Collections:
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorBertók, R. (Rózsa)
dc.creatorÖffenberger, N. (Niels)
dc.date.accessioned2008-03-08T18:33:52Z-
dc.date.available2008-03-08T18:33:52Z-
dc.date.issued1999-
dc.identifier.citationAnuario Filosófico, 1999 (32), 149 - 155-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10171/2350-
dc.description.abstractThis paper provides, from a systematic point of view, some remarks about the identity and difference of theoretical and practical syllogism. While stressing the structural analogy of bolh forms of inference, it draws attention to important differences, such as the possibility of deriving contradictories conclusions from a single set of premises in practical syllogism.es_ES
dc.language.isospaes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.subjectsilogismo prácticoes_ES
dc.subjectAristóteleses_ES
dc.titleObservaciones del así llamado silogismo prácticoes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/reviewes_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.15581/009.32.29596es_ES

Files in This Item:
Thumbnail
File
06.Rózsa Bertók - Niels Óffenberger, Observaciones sobre el así llamado Silogismo Práctico.pdf
Description
Size
1.18 MB
Format
Adobe PDF


Statistics and impact
0 citas en
0 citas en

Items in Dadun are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.