Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.creator | Banaszak, B. (Boguslaw) | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-01-30T14:35:28Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-01-30T14:35:28Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Banaszak, B. (2012). ""Constitutionalisation of Social Human Rights – necessity or luxury?"", Persona y Derecho, 66, 17-28 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.issn | 0211-4526 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10171/34991 | - |
dc.description.abstract | In this article will argue that the weak point of constitutional provisions concerning economic, social and cultural freedoms and rights is delegating the competences of detailed regulation in most cases to the ordinary legislator, at the same time failing to determine the guidelines and framework of its legislative activity. Moreover, some of the regulations concerning social rights are defined by the so-called guideline norms determining in a general way the aims and directions of the state’s activity in various areas. | es_ES |
dc.language.iso | eng | es_ES |
dc.publisher | Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra | es_ES |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es_ES |
dc.subject | Human Rights | es_ES |
dc.subject | Neoconstitucionalism | es_ES |
dc.subject | Fundamental rights | es_ES |
dc.subject | Social rights | es_ES |
dc.subject | Constitutionalisation | es_ES |
dc.title | Constitutionalisation of Social Human Rights – necessity or luxury? | es_ES |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.15581/011.3113 | es_ES |
Files in This Item:
Statistics and impact
Items in Dadun are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.