Full metadata record
Appears in Collections:
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorCerezo, M. (María)
dc.date.accessioned2009-10-21T10:32:06Z-
dc.date.available2009-10-21T10:32:06Z-
dc.date.issued2004-
dc.identifier.citationAnuario Filosófico, 2004 (37), 455 - 479es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10171/4535-
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, I develop some reflections on the interpretation of the notion of Sachverhalt in the Tractatus, with a view to show the complexity of the tractarian view and to point out some tensions. I intend to elucidate this notion in the context of its relation to the notions of Tatsache and Sachlage, and in its relation to the two main theories of the Tractatus, the truthfunctions theory and the picture theory. I hope that this elucidation sheds some light on a possible comparison between Wittgenstein’s and Husserl’s views and I point out some suggestions in this sense in the last part of the paper.es_ES
dc.language.isospaes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.subjectWittgenstein, Ludwiges_ES
dc.subjectHusserl, Edmundes_ES
dc.titleLas nociones de Sachverhalt, Tatsache y Sachlage en el 'Tractatus' de Wittgensteines_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.15581/009.37.29387es_ES

Files in This Item:
Thumbnail
File
13. Cerezo.pdf
Description
Size
150.68 kB
Format
Adobe PDF


Statistics and impact
0 citas en
0 citas en

Items in Dadun are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.