Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.creator | Rovira, R. (Rogelio) | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2009-11-04T10:05:57Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2009-11-04T10:05:57Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2004 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Anuario Filosófico, 2004 (37), 825 - 839 | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10171/4659 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | In his Critique of Pure Reason and in his letter to Johann Schultz, November 25, 1788, Kant proposes at least six arguments in order to prove that arithmetical judgements are synthetic. In this paper these arguments are systematically expounded and critically discussed. | es_ES |
| dc.language.iso | spa | es_ES |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Kant, Immanuel | es_ES |
| dc.subject | juicio | es_ES |
| dc.subject | analítico | es_ES |
| dc.subject | sintético | es_ES |
| dc.title | ¿Son válidas las razones por las que Kant afirma que 7 + 5 = 12 es un juicio sintético? | es_ES |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/workingPaper | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.15581/009.37.29369 | es_ES |
Files in This Item:
Statistics and impact
Items in Dadun are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
