Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.creator | Salas, J. (Jaime) de | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2009-11-04T11:23:26Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2009-11-04T11:23:26Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2005 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Anuario Filosófico, 2005 (38), 87 - 112 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10171/4671 | - |
dc.description.abstract | It is sought to return to the Leibnizian’s concept of contingency to thwart the postkantian’s and posthegelian’s philosophy of it. This search records two relatively different ways: Leibniz, as a typical thinker of his time, and Leibniz as a precursor of our own contemporary way of thinking. As regards this, the comparison that is made with Sartre and Rorty gains special importance. | es_ES |
dc.language.iso | spa | es_ES |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es_ES |
dc.subject | Leibniz, Gottfried | es_ES |
dc.subject | contingencia | es_ES |
dc.subject | Sartre, Jean-Paul | es_ES |
dc.subject | Rorty, Richard | es_ES |
dc.title | Perspectiva y contingencia en Leibniz | es_ES |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.15581/009.38.29345 | es_ES |
Files in This Item:
Statistics and impact
Items in Dadun are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.