Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.creator | Breeze, R. (Ruth) | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-03-30T07:59:59Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-03-30T07:59:59Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2018-08-14 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Breeze, R. (Ruth). "Fixing points on a shifting landscape. Truth, lies and politics in two reader comments pages". Journal of Language and Politics. 18 (1), 2018-08-14, 1 - 20 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.issn | 1569-2159 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10171/60192 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This paper focuses on reader comments published in two online UK newspapers (Mail Online and Independent) in response to articles about one discreditable incident involving a far-right political leader. The concepts of articulation and fixation are used to examine how these readers engage with the politician’s actions using ethical categories. While Independent readers build theoretical articulations between the politician’s actions and a generalised crisis of confidence in politics, readers of the Mail Online, regardless of their political sympathies, accept ethical categories as fixed points to anchor the discourse. | es_ES |
dc.language.iso | eng | es_ES |
dc.publisher | John Benjamins | es_ES |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es_ES |
dc.subject | Political discourse | es_ES |
dc.subject | Social media | es_ES |
dc.subject | Reader comments | es_ES |
dc.subject | Political logics | es_ES |
dc.title | Fixing points on a shifting landscape. Truth, lies and politics in two reader comments pages | es_ES |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
dadun.citation.endingPage | 20 | es_ES |
dadun.citation.number | 1 | es_ES |
dadun.citation.publicationName | Journal of Language and Politics | es_ES |
dadun.citation.startingPage | 1 | es_ES |
dadun.citation.volume | 18 | es_ES |
Files in This Item:
Statistics and impact
Items in Dadun are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.