Full metadata record
Appears in Collections:
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorBykova, M. (Marina)-
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-02-
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-23T10:23:46Z-
dc.date.available2021-08-23T10:23:46Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationBykova, M. (Marina). "Kant’s “I Think” and Fichte’s principle of self-positing". Anuario Filosófico. 52 (1), 2019, 145 - 165es
dc.identifier.issn0066-5215-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10171/61488-
dc.description.abstractThis paper discusses the relation between Kant’s doctrine of pure apperception (the doctrine of the “I think”) and Fichte’s theory of self-positing. It shows that Kant’s conception of the transcendental unity of apperception is closer to Fichte’s principle of self-positing than is usually thought, and that Kant’s “I think,” and not Reinhold’s “principle of consciousness”, may have been a source of inspiration for Fichte in his attempt to justify transcendental idealism. As in Kant, in Fichte’s <i>Wissenschaftslehre</i>, the activity of “self-positing” is the fundamental feature of the I-hood. Similar to Kant, in Fichte, too, the fi rst principle expresses a peculiar kind of unity, which he calls the original unity of self-consciousness (<i>Tathandlung</i>).en_US
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherServicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarraes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.titleKant’s “I Think” and Fichte’s principle of self-positingen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.15581/009.52.1.145-165-
dadun.citation.endingPage165-
dadun.citation.number1-
dadun.citation.publicationNameAnuario Filosófico-
dadun.citation.startingPage145-
dadun.citation.volume52-

Files in This Item:
Thumbnail
File
malonsod, 06.pdf
Description
Size
8.42 MB
Format
Adobe PDF


Statistics and impact
0 citas en
0 citas en

Items in Dadun are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.