Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorBaptista, P.M. (Peter M.)-
dc.creatorGaraycochea, O. (Octavio)-
dc.creatorPrieto-Matos, C. (Carlos)-
dc.creatorÁlvarez-de-Linera-Alperi, M. (Marta)-
dc.creatorAlcalde, J. (Juan)-
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-09T12:26:11Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-09T12:26:11Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationBaptista, P.M. (Peter M.); Garaycochea, O. (Octavio); Prieto-Matos, C. (Carlos); et al. "Lacrimal Diversion Devices (Sinopsys Lacrimal Stent): Sharing our Experience with Patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis without Polyposis". International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology. 23 (4), 2019, e422 - e426es
dc.identifier.issn1809-4864-
dc.identifier.otherPMID: 31649762-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10171/61980-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a highly prevalent pathology in our society. Due to the prevalence of this condition and to the persisting symptoms despite an appropriate medical treatment, surgical techniques are often required. Lately, minimal invasive techniques have been described, such as lacrimal diversion devices (LDDs). This technique offers a fast and convenient choice for delivery of sinus irrigation and topical medication. Objective: We aimed to describe our experience with LDDs and evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the procedure in patients with moderate to severe CRS without nasal polyposis (CRSsNP) and persistent symptomatology despite medical therapy. Methods: A total of 7 patients underwent bilateral lacrimal stents placement in the operating room. A retrospective observational study was conducted. The Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-20 (SNOT-20) survey was performed and the score obtained was compared before and 1 month after the procedure. Results: The LDDs were used for an average of 80 days. During the follow-up, only three patients had a mild complication with the device (granuloma in the punctum, obstruction, and early extrusion). The mean baseline SNOT-20 score dropped significantly (p ¼ 0.015) from 25.85 to 11.57 (mean: - 14.29) 1 month after the procedure. Conclusion: According to our experience and results, the use of LDD is a novel, feasible, and less invasive technique to treat refractory CRS. It reduces the risk of mucosal stripping, provides short-term outcomes, and the surgical procedure does not require advanced training in endoscopic sinus surgery. Moreover, it can be performed in-office under local anesthesia or sedation.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherGeorg Thieme Verlag KGes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.subjectMaterias Investigacion::Ciencias de la Salud::Otorrinolaringologíaes_ES
dc.subjectSinusitises_ES
dc.subjectParanasal sinuseses_ES
dc.subjectNasolacrimal ductes_ES
dc.subjectMinimally invasive surgical procedureses_ES
dc.subjectNasal surgical procedureses_ES
dc.subjectDrug delivery systemses_ES
dc.titleLacrimal Diversion Devices (Sinopsys Lacrimal Stent): Sharing our Experience with Patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis without Polyposises_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.description.noteReconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivadaes_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1055/s-0039-1683849-
dadun.citation.endingPagee426es_ES
dadun.citation.number4es_ES
dadun.citation.publicationNameInternational Archives of Otorhinolaryngologyes_ES
dadun.citation.startingPagee422es_ES
dadun.citation.volume23es_ES

Files in This Item:
Thumbnail
File
s-0039-1683849.pdf
Description
Size
269.64 kB
Format
Adobe PDF


Statistics and impact
0 citas en
0 citas en

Items in Dadun are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.