Full metadata record
Appears in Collections:
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorRobert, G. (Gaston)-
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-23-
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-22T12:04:50Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-22T12:04:50Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationRobert, G. (Gaston). "Incongruent counterparts and the absolute nature of space in Kant’s 1768 essay, "Directions in Space"". Anuario Filosófico. 53 (2), 2020, 267 - 286es
dc.identifier.issn0066-5215-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10171/64036-
dc.description.abstractThis article argues that Kant’s argument from incongruent counterparts in his essay, <em>Directions in Space </em>(1768) yields not the conclusion that space is an objective reality, but rather that it is an absolute and dynamical framework that grounds spatial properties, a view which is neutral with respect to the objective/subjective nature of space. It is suggested that, so construed, Kant’s argument in this essay can be made consistent with his later employment in support of transcendental idealism with regard to space.en_US
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherServicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarraes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.titleIncongruent counterparts and the absolute nature of space in Kant’s 1768 essay, "Directions in Space"en_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.15581/009.53.2.002-
dadun.citation.endingPage286-
dadun.citation.number2-
dadun.citation.publicationNameAnuario Filosófico-
dadun.citation.startingPage267-
dadun.citation.volume53-

Files in This Item:
Thumbnail
File
rhereder, 02.pdf
Description
Size
541.78 kB
Format
Adobe PDF


Statistics and impact

Items in Dadun are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.