Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorSchwember-Augier, F. (Felipe)-
dc.creatorUrabayen, J. (Julia)-
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-19T08:24:31Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-19T08:24:31Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationSchwember-Augier, F. (Felipe); Urabayen, J. (Julia). "At the margins of ideal cities: the dystopian drift of modern utopias". Sage open. 8 (4), 2018,es_ES
dc.identifier.issn2158-2440-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10171/64501-
dc.description.abstractContemporary political philosophy has critically reflected on—if not denounced—the theoretical constructions and political enterprises that have been encouraged by modern Utopian tradition. This process of critical reflection has constantly signaled the tension between the emancipatory aspirations of that thought and its dystopian drift. Many authors have highlighted the problems that affect the constitution of those ideal cities. However, this article will be focused on the exclusive and excluding character of those ideal narratives, of those unblemished ideal spaces, of those happy spaces that are, in the end, nonspaces. This article will explain the meanings of the modern utopias taking into account the postmodern point of view that shows the exclusion the modern utopias provoke. At the margins of the ideal cities live all those beings that the utopias have vomited out and expelled from their perfect world: monsters, abnormals, infamous, pariahs, and countryless refugees. Those beings— so well described by Arendt and Foucault, among others—are those who are not part of any ideal city; they are the stones that the builders of the perfect cities have used to build them or have discarded them.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThe author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by the Spanish Government (Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, Programa de I+D+i orientada a los Retos de la Sociedad) through the grant “Mapa de Riesgo Social” (Reference: CSO2013-42576-R) and by Chile’s Research Program: proyecto Fondecyt number. 1160982 “Crítica y recepción de las utopías y del utopismo en el liberalismo libertario y en el liberalismo socialdemócrata del siglo XX: Popper, Hayek, Nozick y Rawls.”es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationses_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.subjectIdeal citieses_ES
dc.subjectUtopiaes_ES
dc.subjectDystopiaes_ES
dc.subjectMorees_ES
dc.subjectFoucaultes_ES
dc.titleAt the margins of ideal cities: the dystopian drift of modern utopiases_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.description.noteThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/2158244018803135-
dadun.citation.number4es_ES
dadun.citation.publicationNameSage openes_ES
dadun.citation.volume8es_ES

Files in This Item:
Thumbnail
File
2158244018803135.pdf
Description
Size
100.21 kB
Format
Adobe PDF


Statistics and impact

Items in Dadun are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.