Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.creator | Haack, S. (Susan) | es_ES |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2005-05-27T14:57:30Z | es_ES |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2007-03-08T16:40:07Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2005-05-27T14:57:30Z | es_ES |
| dc.date.available | 2007-03-08T16:40:07Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2001 | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.citation | Anuario Filosófico, 2001 (34), 13-38 | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0066-5215 | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10171/760 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | The article compares the work of Peirce and Popper. It focuses on issues in epistemology and philosophy of science, especially Peirce’s claims that abduction is a matter of logic, and that induc-tion can be given a weak form of justification. Peirce’s and Pop-per’s accounts of the nature of truth and its role in scientific in-quiry are compared, and difficulties are diagnosed in both their attempts to reconcile fallibilism with a definition of truth which allows it to be both objective and regulative. | es_ES |
| dc.format.extent | 95744 bytes | es_ES |
| dc.format.extent | 95744 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 111614 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 1892 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/msword | es_ES |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/msword | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | - |
| dc.language.iso | spa | es_ES |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es_ES |
| dc.title | Dos falibilistas en busca de la verdad | es_ES |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.15581/009.34.29517 | es_ES |
Files in This Item:
Statistics and impact
Items in Dadun are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
