Padial, J.J. (Juan José)2009-11-112009-11-112005Anuario Filosófico, 2005 (38), 269 - 277https://hdl.handle.net/10171/4749The Leibniz’s criticism to nominalism provides the metaphysic a more powerful (modal) logic rather than the extensional one of late-medieval period. At the same time he finds a prosecutive way of thinking that allows the systematization of the intelligibility. I maintain that on the formulation of Leibniz’s ontological argument, one can find the cognoscitive subject. Nevertheless, and in a similar way as Hegel, like Leibniz did not elaborate logic of productive action of inteligible possibility, the facticity introduces itself in the subjects of the monada and on the Self.spainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLeibniz, GottfriedHegel, Georg Wilhelm FriedrichposibilidadnominalismoLógicaLa crítica hegeliana a las conversiones entre modos operadas por Leibnizinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article10.15581/009.38.29353