Facultad de Educación y Psicología
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://hdl.handle.net/10171/38987
En el curso 2013/2014 se constituyó la nueva Facultad de Educación y Psicología. Los materiales anteriores a esa fecha, puede localizarlos en: Facultad de Filosofía y Letras - Departamento de Educación.
See
7 results
Results
- The big five factors as differential predictors of self-regulation, achievement emotions, coping and health behavior in undergraduate students(2024) Fuente-Arias, J. (Jesús) de la; Urien-Angulo, B. (Begoña); Luis-Garcia, E.O. (Elkin Oswaldo); Sander, P. (Paul); Pachón-Basallo, M. (Mónica); Garzón-Umerenkova, A. (Angélica)Background. The aim of this research was to analyze whether the personality factors included in the Big Five model differentially predict the self-regulation and affective states of university students and health. Methods. A total of 637 students completed validated self-report questionnaires. Using an ex post facto design, we conducted linear regression and structural prediction analyses. Results The findings showed that model factors were differential predictors of both self-regulation and affective states. Self-regulation and affective states, in turn, jointly predict emotional performance while learning and even student health. These results allow us to understand, through a holistic predictive model, the differential predictive relationships of all the factors: conscientiousness and extraversion were predictors regulating positive emotionality and health; the openness to experience factor was non-regulating; nonregulating; and agreeableness and neuroticism were dysregulating, hence precursors of negative emotionality and poorer student health. Conclusions. These results are important because they allow us to infer implications for guidance and psychological health at university.
- The Proactive-Reactive Resilience as a Mediational Variable Between the Character Strength and the Flourishing in Undergraduate Students(2022) González-Torres, M.C. (María Carmen); Fuente-Arias, J. (Jesús) de la; Artuch-Garde, R. (Raquel); Urien-Angulo, B. (Begoña); Luis-Garcia, E.O. (Elkin Oswaldo); Balaguer-Estaña, A.J. (Álvaro J.)The aim of this research was to delimit the predictive and mediational model of resilience between character strengths to predict flourishing, in a sample of undergraduate students. After signing their informed consent, 642 university students completed three validated scales (i.e., character strengths, resilience, and flourishing). Using an ex post facto design, regression, structural modeling, and mediation analyses were carried out, in order to construct a multi-causal predictive model. Results indicated a consistent predictive direct effect of character strengths on resilience and flourishing and of resilience on flourishing. As hypothesized, resilience also showed a mediating effect on the relationship between character strengths and flourishing. Additionally, results also revealed that the reactive and proactive factors of resilience were explained by different character strengths (e.g., emotional strength/cognitive, interpersonal strengths), reinforcing the idea that the two directions are complementary and necessary. Finally, several implications were established for the practice of positive psychology.
- The proactive-reactive resilience as a mediational variable between the character strength and the flourishing in undergraduate students(2022) González-Torres, M.C. (María Carmen); Fuente-Arias, J. (Jesús) de la; Artuch-Garde, R. (Raquel); Urien-Angulo, B. (Begoña); Luis-Garcia, E.O. (Elkin Oswaldo); Balaguer-Estaña, A.J. (Álvaro J.)The aim of this research was to delimit the predictive and mediational model of resilience between character strengths to predict flourishing, in a sample of undergraduate students. After signing their informed consent, 642 university students completed three validated scales (i.e., character strengths, resilience, and flourishing). Using an ex post facto design, regression, structural modeling, and mediation analyses were carried out, in order to construct a multi-causal predictive model. Results indicated a consistent predictive direct effect of character strengths on resilience and flourishing and of resilience on flourishing. As hypothesized, resilience also showed a mediating effect on the relationship between character strengths and flourishing. Additionally, results also revealed that the reactive and proactive factors of resilience were explained by different character strengths (e.g., emotional strength/cognitive, interpersonal strengths), reinforcing the idea that the two directions are complementary and necessary. Finally, several implications were established for the practice of positive psychology.
- The role of emotional intelligence and self-care in the stress perception during COVID-19 outbreak: An intercultural moderated mediation analysis(Elsevier, 2021) Martinez, M. (Martín); Sarrionandia, A. (Ainize); Luis-Garcia, E.O. (Elkin Oswaldo); Bermejo-Martins, E. (Elena); Fernández-Berrocal, P. (Pablo)Background: The relationship between emotional intelligence (EI) and stress has been widely studied, as well as the beneficial role of self-care to maintain health and wellbeing. However, the joint contribution of EI and self- care in predicting stress has not been examined during COVID-19 lockdown. This study aimed to examine the mediating role of self-care in the relationship between EI and stress and the potential moderator role of gender. Methods: A sample of 1082 participants from four Hispanic countries completed measures related to socio- demographic, trait emotional intelligence (Trait Meta-Mood Scale), self-care activities (Self-care Activities Screening Scale) and stress (Perceived Stress Scale). Results: Mediation analyses revealed that self-care increased the explained variance of the prediction of stress by EI dimensions after controlling gender and age. However, gender only moderated the relationship between selfcare and stress in the mediation model corresponding to emotional attention. Conclusions: Data supported a general model for the interaction of EI and self-care as contributing factors of stress. Further research is needed to replicate it in more culturally distant samples and to fully explore the po- tential role of gender differences. Future intervention programs should include a balanced combination of EI and self-care to increase their benefits on people’s health
- Validity and reliability of the Self-care Activities Screening Scale (SASS-14) during COVID-19 lockdown(2021) Sarrionandia, A. (Ainize); Luis-Garcia, E.O. (Elkin Oswaldo); Yair-Oliveros, E. (Edwin); Bermejo-Martins, E. (Elena); Martínez-Villar, M. (Martín); Vidaurreta, M. (Marta); Fernández-Berrocal, P. (Pablo)In a context where there is no treatment for the current COVID-19 virus, the combination of self-care behaviours together with confinement, are strategies to decrease the risk of contagion and remain healthy. However, there are no self-care measures to screen self-care activities in general population and which, could be briefly in a lockdown situation. This research aims to build and validate a psychometric tool to screen self-care activities in general population. Firstly, an exploratory factor analysis was performed in a sample of 226 participants to discover the underlying factorial structure and to reduce the number of items in the original tool into a significant pool of items related to self-care. Later a confirmatory factor analyses were performed in a new sample of 261 participants to test for the fit and goodness of factor solutions. Internal validity, reliability, and convergent validity between its score with perceived stress and psychological well-being measures were examined on this sample. The exploratory analyses suggested a four-factor solution, corresponding to health consciousness, nutrition and physical activity, sleep, and intra-personal and inter-personal coping skills (14 items). Then, the four-factor structure was confirmed as the best model fit for self-care activities. The tool demonstrated good reliability, predictive validity of individuals¿ perception of coping with COVID-19 lockdown, and convergent validity with well-being and perceived stress.
- Risk of poisoning in children and adolescents with ADHD: a systematic review and meta-analysis(2018) Castro-Manglano, P. (Pilar) de; Cortese, S. (Samuele); Luis-Garcia, E.O. (Elkin Oswaldo); Arrondo, G. (Gonzalo); Soutullo-Esperón, C. (César Alejandro); Aznárez-Sanado, M. (Maite); Magallon-Recalde, S. (Sara); Ruiz-Goikoetxea, M. (Maite); Alvarez-Zallo, N. (Noelia)Poisoning, a subtype of physical injury, is an important hazard in children and youth. Individuals with ADHD may be at higher risk of poisoning. Here, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify this risk. Furthermore, since physical injuries, likely share causal mechanisms with those of poisoning, we compared the relative risk of poisoning and injuries pooling studies reporting both. As per our pre-registered protocol (PROSPERO ID CRD42017079911), we searched 114 databases through November 2017. From a pool of 826 potentially relevant references, screened independently by two researchers, nine studies (84,756 individuals with and 1,398,946 without the disorder) were retained. We pooled hazard and odds ratios using Robust Variance Estimation, a meta-analytic method aimed to deal with non-independence of outcomes. We found that ADHD is associated with a significantly higher risk of poisoning (Relative Risk¿=¿3.14, 95% Confidence Interval¿=¿2.23 to 4.42). Results also indicated that the relative risk of poisoning is significantly higher than that of physical injuries when comparing individuals with and without ADHD (Beta coefficient¿=¿0.686, 95% Confidence Interval¿=¿0.166 to 1.206). These findings should inform clinical guidelines and public health programs aimed to reduce physical risks in children/adolescents with ADHD.
- I Jornada de experiencias del Programa de Psicología(2017) Luis-Garcia, E.O. (Elkin Oswaldo); Arrondo, G. (Gonzalo); Magallon-Recalde, S. (Sara)Las Jornadas de experiencia pretenden ser una ocasión que brinde a los alumnos de Prácticum de todos los Grados de la Facultad de Educación y Psicología. Compartir su experiencia de prácticas entre ellos, con sus profesores y con los compañeros de otros cursos, especialmente con aquellos que todavía no han realizado el Prácticum o están buscando un centro para hacer prácticas voluntarias. A través de la presentación oral, de un póster o de un e-portafolio, los alumnos darán a conocer los proyectos de investigación-acción o de aprendizaje-servicio que han llevado a cabo durante el Prácticum. En sus exposiciones, mostrarán cómo han aplicado a la práctica la teoría aprendida en las diversas asignaturas de los Grados y compartirán el desarrollo competencial que esta experiencia les ha permitido realizar. Además, facilitarán a los profesores conocer, de una forma más directa, las necesidades o aspectos de mejora que los alumnos han detectado en los centros de prácticas y ayudarán a identificar posibles líneas de investigación y proyectos que podrán realizarse en colaboración con los colegios, gabinetes, hospitales, fundaciones, empresas y diversas instituciones en las que los alumnos realizan el Prácticum.