REV - Persona y Derecho - Vol. 1-10

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://hdl.handle.net/10171/7544

See

Results

Now showing 1 - 10 of 22
  • Thumbnail Image
    Los derechos del hombre en la constitución española de 1978 y en los pactos internacionales de la O.N.U.
    (Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra, 1983) Zumaquero, J.M. (José Manuel)
  • Thumbnail Image
    Los derechos del hombre en la constitución española de 1978 y en los pactos internacionales de la O.N.U.
    (Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra, 1983) Zumaquero, J.M. (José Manuel)
  • Thumbnail Image
    Consideraciones sobre la noción de matrimonio
    (Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra, 1983) Hervada, J. (Javier)
  • Thumbnail Image
    De derecho natural medieval al derecho natural moderno: Fernando Vazquez de Menchaca F. Carpintero Benítez
    (Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra, 1978) Zumaquero, J.M. (José Manuel)
  • Thumbnail Image
    Libertad. Autenticidad y derecho natural
    (Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra, 1976) Hervada, J. (Javier)
  • Thumbnail Image
    ¿Hay una verdad incondicional acerca del hombre?
    (Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra, 1976) Martínez-Doral, J.M. (José María)
  • Thumbnail Image
    La coacción del estado
    (Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra, 1976) Zafra-Valverde, J. (José)
    In this paper, the author offers a morphological study ot coercion as a means ot social control organized within political society. We are dealing here with a highly descriptive study, a tact which does not prevent the author from incidentally making scientitic appraisals or trom delíberately offering the bases tor appreciations ot an ethical and social nature. After a series ot introductory considerations destined to put torth the presence and objectives ot coercion and ot violence within the ample panorama ot social realíty -and particularly within the framework ot political experiences- the author proposes a precise concept ot coercion which serves as a gUide tor a more complete and more satistactory typological analysis ot the same. The first step in this analysis consists ot the differentiation between the two main types ot material coercion -physical and moral- and that type ot coercion which the author calls virtuai, which tinds its most commonly known and treated manitestation in mandates and imperative acts. It is important to point out the observations dedicated to the concepts ot admonition and ot degradation as the principal forms ot moral coercion, as well as those which are brought to bear upon the idea ot political Constitution in its relations with the phenomena of material and virtual coercion. In the concepts of political «retention» and «subjection», we find a plausible base of discussion for making up a realístic image of the Constitution of the State, as it is considered in one of its facets. The author then dedicates a large part ot his study to examining the diverse modalíties of coercion, keeping in mind the different functions which it can accomplish. He then explains, along with the thoroughly studied torms of reparatory and dissuasive coercion, the ideas of basic polítical coercion -to be found in practice in deportation measures, for example-, ot eliminatory coercion -which touches, very characteristically, acts pertaining to the políce- and of testimonial coercion. The study of this last type leads to the establishment ot various interesting conclusions with regard to judicial proceedings of a polítical nature, and the exercise of the prerogative ot penal grace by means of amnesty or indult. Finally, the explanation of the contrast between ponderable coercion and expeditious coercion contributes to the desirable finality ot correctly determining the límits ot Law within the framework ot coercion as a means of social control within the State.
  • Thumbnail Image
    L´uomo tolemanico S. Cotta
    (Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra, 1975) D'Agostino, F. (Francesco)
  • Thumbnail Image
    Le mariage dans lécole allemande du droit naturel moderne au XVIII siecle
    (Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra, 1975) Zumaquero, J.M. (José Manuel)
  • Thumbnail Image
    Los transplantes de órganos y el derecho a disponer del propio cuerpo
    (Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra, 1975) Hervada, J. (Javier)
    This article begins with a few preliminary terminological explanations which the author believes to be necessary: al the distinction between transfusions and transplants, which are usually included in the same category by moralists and jurists; bl the difference between transplants of organs, tissues, and members. The author then proceeds to study the right over one's own body, with the understanding that the well-known formula homo non est dominus membrorum suorum must be interpreted juridically as the inexistence of any absolute right of disposition over one's own body. The contents and limits of the right over one's own body are regulated by three principies: the indirect voluntary (double effectl principie, the principie of totality, and the moderata castigatio corporis. With regard to transfusions, the author points out the requirements of liceity on the part of donor and recipient, and draws particular attention upon the subject of conscientious objectors (i.e., Jehovah's Witnessesl. In relation to trasplants, the author studies those which have been performed directly between humans, with special attention given to those between two living persons. The liceity of this last case -apart from other requirements which are expounded upon in detail- rests upon the following conditions: al that the finalit Y of the donation be an act of human solidarity; bl that the donor not become gravely jeopardized as a result. With regard to transplants between a deceased donor and a live recipient, the authors insists upon the need to respect the cadaver and to secure due authorization. The author also studies, with special care, border-line cases in which the donor may find himself: hopeless, clinically dead, artificially alive, recuperable.