La crítica hegeliana a las conversiones entre modos operadas por Leibniz
dc.contributor.author | Padial, J.J. (Juan José) | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2009-11-11T11:04:17Z | |
dc.date.available | 2009-11-11T11:04:17Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2005 | |
dc.description.abstract | The Leibniz’s criticism to nominalism provides the metaphysic a more powerful (modal) logic rather than the extensional one of late-medieval period. At the same time he finds a prosecutive way of thinking that allows the systematization of the intelligibility. I maintain that on the formulation of Leibniz’s ontological argument, one can find the cognoscitive subject. Nevertheless, and in a similar way as Hegel, like Leibniz did not elaborate logic of productive action of inteligible possibility, the facticity introduces itself in the subjects of the monada and on the Self. | es_ES |
dc.identifier.citation | Anuario Filosófico, 2005 (38), 269 - 277 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.15581/009.38.29353 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10171/4749 | |
dc.language.iso | spa | es_ES |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es_ES |
dc.subject | Leibniz, Gottfried | es_ES |
dc.subject | Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich | es_ES |
dc.subject | posibilidad | es_ES |
dc.subject | nominalismo | es_ES |
dc.subject | Lógica | es_ES |
dc.title | La crítica hegeliana a las conversiones entre modos operadas por Leibniz | es_ES |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | es |
relation.isAuthorOfPublication | 85de0718-19fd-46b9-9ceb-f88845777b00 | |
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 85de0718-19fd-46b9-9ceb-f88845777b00 |