Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.creator | Moros-Claramunt, E. (Enrique) | es_ES |
dc.date.accessioned | 2004-11-30T10:12:11Z | es_ES |
dc.date.accessioned | 2007-03-08T16:39:24Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2004-11-30T10:12:11Z | es_ES |
dc.date.available | 2007-03-08T16:39:24Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 1999 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.citation | Anuario Filosófico 1999 (32), 697-724 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.issn | 0066-5215 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10171/417 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The criticism of Bernstein on the encyclical Fides et ratio, claiming that it does not take into account the progress made by the best philosophies of this Century on the analysis of truth, is false. This paper show that the encyclical does take into account the achievements of analytical epistemology. Also it says that the even challenges analytical philosophy to deal with even more important issues such as the role of metaphysics in the analysis of human knowledge and conceptual language. | es_ES |
dc.format.extent | 238592 bytes | es_ES |
dc.format.extent | 238592 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 120760 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 1892 bytes | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/msword | es_ES |
dc.format.mimetype | application/msword | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | - |
dc.language.iso | spa | es_ES |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es_ES |
dc.subject | Fe | es_ES |
dc.subject | Bernstein, Richard J. | es_ES |
dc.subject | Neopositivismo | es_ES |
dc.subject | Filosofía analítica | es_ES |
dc.subject | Lingüística | es_ES |
dc.subject | Epistemología | es_ES |
dc.title | La filosofía analítica y la encíclica "Fides et ratio" | es_ES |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.15581/009.32.29566 | es_ES |
Files in This Item:
Statistics and impact
Items in Dadun are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.