Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.creator | George, M. I. (Marie I.) | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-01-23T08:37:45Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2017-01-23T08:37:45Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2016 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | George, M. I. (2016). Evolution in Court. A Federal Judge Defines Science. Scientia et Fides 4, Nº 2, pp. 397-415 | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2353-5636 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10171/42855 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | This article highlights certain recurring themes in Mariano Artigas’s works by examining a judicial decision made in the United States in 1982 concerning the teaching of “creation-science” alongside “evolution-science” in public schools. These themes include: the proper delimitation of the boundaries of science, the importance of philosophy as a bridge between science and religion, and the misunderstandings concerning the limits of science inherent in scientism. | es_ES |
| dc.language.iso | eng | es_ES |
| dc.publisher | Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra | es_ES |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Scientism | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Philosophy as bridge | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Falsifiability | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Creation-science | es_ES |
| dc.title | Evolution in Court. A Federal Judge Defines Science | es_ES |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
Files in This Item:
Statistics and impact
Items in Dadun are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
