Full metadata record
Appears in Collections:
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorWolff-Metternich, B.S. (Brigitta Sophie) von
dc.date.accessioned2009-10-28T11:25:18Z-
dc.date.available2009-10-28T11:25:18Z-
dc.date.issued2004-
dc.identifier.citationAnuario Filosófico, 2004 (37), 733 - 747es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10171/4581-
dc.description.abstractStandard readings of Kant’s ethical thought usually focus on the Groundwork, and, more particularly, in the application of the categorial imperative to any given maxim. In doing so, the standard readings do not take into account the necessary role of judgment in this process. After sketching the difference between determining and reflective judgment, and enlarging our view of Kant’s ethics beyond the basic principles conveyed in Groundwork, the author discusses which may be the role of reflective judgment in Kant’s moral thought. As a result, an entirely different approach to the socalled applied ethics emerges.es_ES
dc.language.isospaes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.subjectjuicioes_ES
dc.subjectKant, Immanueles_ES
dc.subjectéticaes_ES
dc.titleSobre el papel del juicio práctico en la filosofía moral de Kantes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.15581/009.37.29360es_ES

Files in This Item:
Thumbnail
File
VON WOLFF.pdf
Description
Size
81.02 kB
Format
Adobe PDF


Statistics and impact
0 citas en
0 citas en

Items in Dadun are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.