Evaluation of PCR and indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay on milk samples for diagnosis of brucellosis in dairy cattle
Keywords: 
Brucella genetics
Brucella immunology
Brucellosis, Bovine diagnosis
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay methods
Milk microbiology
Polymerase Chain Reaction methods
Female
Issue Date: 
1995
Publisher: 
American Society for Microbiology
ISSN: 
0095-1137
Citation: 
Romero C, Pardo M, Grillo MJ, Diaz R, Blasco JM, Lopez-Goni I. Evaluation of PCR and indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay on milk samples for diagnosis of brucellosis in dairy cattle. J Clin Microbiol 1995 Dec;33(12):3198-3200.
Abstract
A study was performed to evaluate the previously described PCR (C. Romero, C. Gamazo, M. Pardo, and I. López-Goñi, J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:615-617, 1995) for the diagnosis of brucellosis in dairy cattle. Milk samples from 56 Brucella milk culture-positive cattle and from 37 cattle from Brucella-free herds were examined for Brucella DNA by PCR and for specific antibodies by an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The specificities of both tests were 100% when testing the milk samples from Brucella-free cattle. The milk samples from 49 infected cattle were positive by PCR (87.5% sensitivity), and 55 were positive by ELISA (98.2% sensitivity). A PCR-positive sample was negative by ELISA, and 7 ELISA-positive samples were PCR negative, yielding an observed proportion of agreement of 0.91 for the two tests. Although the results suggest that ELISA is a better screening test than PCR, the combined sensitivity of the two assays was 100%, and their simultaneous application could be more useful than one test alone for a rapid screening of brucellosis in dairy cattle.

Files in This Item:
Thumbnail
File
Evaluation of PCR.pdf
Description
Size
160.47 kB
Format
Adobe PDF


Statistics and impact
0 citas en
0 citas en

Items in Dadun are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.