Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorRobles-Garcia, J.E. (José Enrique)-
dc.creatorHevia, M. (Mateo)-
dc.creatorAlgarra, R. (Rubén)-
dc.creatorDíez-Caballero, F. (Fernando)-
dc.creatorPascual, J.I. (Juan Ignacio)-
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-08T08:26:24Z-
dc.date.available2024-02-08T08:26:24Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationRobles-Garcia, J.E. (José Enrique); Hevia, M. (Mateo); Algarra, R. (Rubén); et al. "Prevalence analysis of urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy and influential preoperative factors in a single institution". The Aging Male. 21 (1), 2017, 24 - 30es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10171/68896-
dc.description.abstractAims: To assess prevalence of urinary incontinence (UI) after radical prostatectomy (RP) and to analyze which preoperative characteristics of the patients have influence on UI. Methods: Between 2002 and 2012, 746 consecutive patients underwent RP for clinically localized prostate cancer. We defined UI according to International Continence Society (ICS) definition: “the complaint of any involuntary leakage of urine” after 12 months of recovery, international consultation on incontinence questionnaire (ICIQ-SF) and pads/day was collected too. Clinical features and magnetic resonance imaging measurements were assessed. A multivariable logistic regression model predicting incontinence were built-in after adjust by cofounding factors and bootstrapping. Results: About 172 (23%) of the patients were classified as incontinent according to the ICS definition. The mean value of the ICIQ-SF was 10.87 (±4). 17.8% of patients use at least one pad/day, 11.9% use more than one pad/day. The preoperative factors independently influential in UI are: age [OR: 1.055; CI 95% (1.006–1.107), p = .028], urethral wall thickness [OR: 5.03; CI 95% (1.11–22.8), p = .036], history of transurethral resection of the prostate [OR: 6.13; CI 95% (1.86–20.18), p = .003] and membranous urethral length [OR: 0.173; CI 95% (0.046–0.64), p = .009]. The predictive accuracy of the model is 78.7% and the area under the curve (AUC) value 71.7%. Conclusions: Urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy has different prevalence depending on the definition. Age, prior transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), membranous urethral length (MUL) and urethral wall thickness (UWT) were risk factors.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.subjectRadical prostatectomyes_ES
dc.subjectUrinary incontinencees_ES
dc.subjectNomogrames_ES
dc.subjectPredictiones_ES
dc.subjectMagnetic resonance imaginges_ES
dc.subjectProstate canceres_ES
dc.titlePrevalence analysis of urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy and influential preoperative factors in a single institutiones_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13685538.2017.1369944es_ES
dc.editorial.note© 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Groupes_ES
dadun.citation.endingPage30es_ES
dadun.citation.number1es_ES
dadun.citation.publicationNameThe Aging Malees_ES
dadun.citation.startingPage24es_ES
dadun.citation.volume21es_ES

Files in This Item:
Thumbnail
File
Documento.pdf
Description
Size
1.07 MB
Format
Adobe PDF


Statistics and impact
0 citas en
0 citas en

Items in Dadun are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.