Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorCamina, E. (Eduardo)-
dc.creatorGüell-Pelayo, F. (Francisco)-
dc.creatorSepulcre, J. (Jorge)-
dc.creatorBernácer-María, J. (Javier)-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-20T11:53:01Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-20T11:53:01Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationCamina, E. (Eduardo); Guell, F. (F.); Sepulcre, J. (Jorge); et al. "Hubs of belief networks across sociodemographic and ideological groups". Social Network Analysis and Mining. (12), 2022,es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1869-5469-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10171/65744-
dc.description.abstractBeliefs are essential components of the human mind, as they define personal identity, integration and adaptation to social groups. Most theoretical studies suggest that beliefs are organized as structured networks: the so-called belief system. According to these studies and their empirical implementation using graph-theoretical approaches, a belief is any proposition considered as true by the respondent. In a recent contribution, we introduced a novel operationalization: a proposition is a belief if (1) it is taken to be true; and (2) the subject declares to be willing to hold it even if irrefutable evidence were hypothetically argued against it. Here, we implement this operationalization using a graph theory approach to investigate the network organization of the belief system in a sample of 108 participants, as well as the differences between key ideological (left- vs. right-wingers) and sociodemographic features (younger vs. older, female vs. male). We identified a well-coordinated network of interlocked spiritual, prosocial and nature-related beliefs, which displays a dense core of 10 hub nodes. Moreover, we observed how specific social liberalist beliefs and transcendental or individualistic/prosocial viewpoints are articulated within left- and right-wingers networks or younger and older participants. Interestingly, we observed that females tend to engage in denser belief networks than male respondents. In conclusion, our research expands tangible scientific evidence of the belief system of humans through the network study of belief reports, which in turn opens innovative ways to study belief systems in social and clinical samples.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipEC was supported by a fellowship from the “Asociación de Amigos” of the University of Navarra, and travel grant from Obra Social “La Caixa” and Fundación Bancaria Caja Navarra. Open Access funding provided thanks to the CRUE-CSIC agreement with Springer Nature.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherSpringeres_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.subjectBelief systemes_ES
dc.subjectCentralityes_ES
dc.subjectGraph theoryes_ES
dc.subjectSegregationes_ES
dc.subjectWeighted degreees_ES
dc.titleHubs of belief networks across sociodemographic and ideological groupses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.description.noteThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licensees_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s13278-022-00964-y-
dadun.citation.number12es_ES
dadun.citation.publicationNameSocial Network Analysis and Mininges_ES

Files in This Item:
Thumbnail
File
s13278-022-00964-y (1).pdf
Description
Size
3.33 MB
Format
Adobe PDF


Statistics and impact

Items in Dadun are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.